Re: [105attendees] departure report

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 29 July 2019 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D8512012E for <105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJGnJ_IzDT6i for <105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 380C9120127 for <105attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AF4A242109D; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:13:39 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN4PR0601MB3728289A9C78D482AE6A968E86C20@SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:13:38 +0100
Cc: "105attendees@ietf.org" <105attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F7611BAB-12E5-43E2-AFA6-9D730F0DFF01@rfc1035.com>
References: <2EB43B36-53C1-4417-87EA-606584F08F98@tislabs.com> <679c4c40-bd96-0907-cb19-9747dbb031f1@labs.htt-consult.com> <859BD44A-2955-4DBD-A32F-D0A8D8C1A35F@gmail.com> <SN4PR0601MB3728289A9C78D482AE6A968E86C20@SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/105attendees/VxK8YgWnpmNPqoMu_BIZG-q3xBI>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] departure report
X-BeenThere: 105attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <105attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/105attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:13:45 -0000


> On 28 Jul 2019, at 22:21, Scheffenegger, Richard <Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com> wrote:
> 
> But it seems that baggage handling tends to be less efficient in the new worlds, compared to the old world, taking much more advance notice to work out properly.

Just remember the Golden Rule of air travel: never, ever check in a bag.