IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [105attendees] Agenda Bashing was Re: Administrative Plenary Time Constraint: Must End by 21:00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 24 July 2019 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0908120489; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6NOMa9UzkX4R; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A12120476; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (dhcp-8550.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.133.80]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CB11F44B; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 33F6D1624; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, 105attendees@ietf.org, IAB <iab@iab.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20422AA6-BED4-4A7F-9083-1F9653BDD6CC@gmail.com>
References: <556DAC1F-F4EB-4986-AFF2-F616376F77C3@ietf.org> <9f207e34-ed63-610c-98c9-7ef7a4543d42@comcast.net> <A9CE1857-CB50-401F-93A3-E89C567601EB@vpnc.org> <52017F86-D123-48B1-8A08-1E4C885C80A2@akamai.com> <20422AA6-BED4-4A7F-9083-1F9653BDD6CC@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> message dated "Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:11:35 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:29:39 -0400
Message-ID: <16238.1563985779@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/105attendees/fRYx_p2vo9ZclYwsvKItxYYDH4Q>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Agenda Bashing was Re: Administrative Plenary Time Constraint: Must End by 21:00
X-BeenThere: 105attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <105attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/105attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:29:29 -0000

Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I’m conflicted about this. Time used for what might be speech-making
    > from one person, could be a more nuanced point from another. We keep
    > saying we need to use our f2f time more efficiently. Well, sometimes
    > that means breadth and a lot of people providing quick input and it
    > also can mean depth and giving folks enough time to say something
    > clearly. I think hard and fast rules like fixed time limits will
    > prevent the latter (from both ends of the room).

Maybe we need "+1" paddles people can raise.
Or people could be asked humm if they agree or disagree.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email