Re: [105attendees] Agenda Bashing was Re: Administrative Plenary Time Constraint: Must End by 21:00

"Aaron Falk" <> Wed, 24 July 2019 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E7512006F; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5hD7F1mFBeXP; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8442412006D; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id a27so33847319qkk.5; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y8irCdzUxTBxZLpyScc+iZHyPx/JlG/9F+BX2TmCw9E=; b=XG+M5slh/7D5Bwk/MxhMeQ3GNE6D1rfqO/BT/Fbz6ABzPcyU7mV+PVh742q9KF5H5u jx0Hlf/OdQ2Job800gLL/FiXwYiIYNIT5mooJPQ0Jo/fMPkyiXSrhOPZIblVioePHRrs LwJOcNg/MRGUhsUv4PCIXUi6YoiRMcA8OmhcORVmAv6Q6VWdDr2/m8wiJ9xyEGXJhG+n 7HpL0g6k+VfOqT/1GLfl/kEzICXTj8+Kl34M59VHquPgwmGz4R5r46Rd1cneEklBTf7q ZWlLjsAiEY2CKhtD2elPC6Wv7kFKQfAt+TkskvRH27KM+QRXoxZ1jxYNPo2Ld7WclZuJ H7lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y8irCdzUxTBxZLpyScc+iZHyPx/JlG/9F+BX2TmCw9E=; b=C36HIqbEql+QWxWZAQLn77DwUp5At3zfdGlFsEJsWjUPMZnv99gS6u1lrFXGuuT7Tw dU3Avl0R0JbkAD8OsBHjysxmlzgidWl4zrz71zX7lsn6YQ8COs30wsjm6Carwiv7eYVx gAqmHhiIsJa25q8e40gYj+v6yHB5OjNkn1PcW6jeOii8jQiN6a9PwmjapK17F5qbGG9X 7lCfD9ZIVbd4BgW6XmxDf+GVk4EiQv5l4TFHxoQHV4Y5mbnQn8uoAtR4ufKvx4NGWHiY 6mdapEGSFHkeXgwM7L+AC4b0O7xTirzqcAqH6VNpJ/c2LwHucXnomsWtfqAQ7flFzM+G KmFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQ+HCRxOq4gHBX9yE2ZcqLMzDkiP2ziLer25cyxP4GOgj0/V3T s3+XOW1pbUwYZkUSqHS9uwg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjNnwRjXJBmFDbRBpFHNcGHGhddqg2CiKaBCYWYlrDYTKlGMaB124jiInClATxp3NfnNzenw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:5204:: with SMTP id g4mr51893545qkb.35.1563977498480; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([2001:67c:1232:144:61f5:f11b:52ea:98c6]) by with ESMTPSA id u18sm19771302qkj.98.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <>
To: "Salz, Rich" <>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <>,,, IAB <>, The IESG <>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:11:35 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_57ABD367-BA15-4F71-9CE4-7FCF6A3DF069_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Agenda Bashing was Re: Administrative Plenary Time Constraint: Must End by 21:00
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:11:42 -0000

I’m conflicted about this.  Time used for what might be speech-making 
from one person, could be a more nuanced point from another.  We keep 
saying we need to use our f2f time more efficiently.    Well, sometimes 
that means breadth and a lot of people providing quick input and it also 
can mean depth and giving folks enough time to say something clearly.  I 
think hard and fast rules like fixed time limits will prevent the latter 
(from both ends of the room).

YMMV, of course.


On 24 Jul 2019, at 9:57, Salz, Rich wrote:

> I strongly agree with Paul.  A uniform time limit -- on both mic and 
> dais speakers -- is the only way to be fair. And the dais time-limit 
> should be total, otherwise a one-minute comment from the floor becomes 
> 10 minutes of response from the dais, which defeats the goal of 
> hearing community input.
> If that is, in fact, the goal.
> -- 
> 105attendees mailing list