IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [106attendees] Power strips ?

"John Levine" <ietf@johnlevine.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B23512004A for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=uDWBTrVb; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=t7wXuZPN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KuxPzO6R3ODg for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1851D120025 for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:01:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 63777 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2019 04:01:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=f91c.5dd75d81.k1911; i=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=VLIxC9UBi4xJoVoN/MFe9sXrTYCLlJ24ICuZ3yNk97Y=; b=uDWBTrVbU/uS9Umc3dd3V1OlowuTvPfNJnojXW/aoAWPNw3iSoNfjYQtJpfS7r8YDzG0Aw6ZPrrx92nywBIeONshacGM7XuVL+NGmzOS5BuYmW8RqmzJqT2wwyRQI00S7WWEXk4mKKExDOYNUoYPMI9ONoIDhjsc5H1GEs/B9Aqsqb/c3est+WT/4xnukIRBP+w2GM1O/xHgrZioeubjivtgJHBfqwvePZc+3AY6AhF5BFSBdYqB6k6Bw7UUkvqI
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=f91c.5dd75d81.k1911; olt=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=VLIxC9UBi4xJoVoN/MFe9sXrTYCLlJ24ICuZ3yNk97Y=; b=t7wXuZPNUtq0WOdJ4qA7d6llYWBt26HZ0hyQZurNJj9zM/+0Gv1/sJBm3D5CROToNTNLHiZSXcmFIqrijKRmNBQWvO6Q7IOPEmvVDdGj3HAPcY+8yCy3Y3xYgIHd4IdyCXCNgUns9LS7fcAUl5Uyw/wzWW8fAqnufRalkAguYbR5Pk8StlwfsT7dIGc0XQwlnWbxKXyTBd1LugqGgNxsyYw5IYFdpeenDSC53iiV8XqnhHiOfTCUYimpRX/3TLO3
Received: from dhcp-8506.meeting.ietf.org ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, printer@iecc.com) via TCP6; 22 Nov 2019 04:01:05 -0000
Received: by dhcp-8506.meeting.ietf.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 29CF4F78245; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:01:02 +0800 (+08)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:01:02 +0800
Message-Id: <20191122040103.29CF4F78245@dhcp-8506.meeting.ietf.org>
From: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: 106attendees@ietf.org
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLQn=2w4dn1-Ox3fYoxboJE81+dn5PGROVfHzmCd8at_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/CwU_oF99nV6AL3QLJBDUJoETiIQ>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Power strips ?
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:01:08 -0000

In article <CALaySJLQn=2w4dn1-Ox3fYoxboJE81+dn5PGROVfHzmCd8at_Q@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>As I noted, ICANN does it, and it works.  We could find out from them
>what sorts of costs and approvals are involved, but they don't seem to
>have problems with their not being allowed.

ICANN apparently sends so much stuff to their meetings that it fills
several shipping containers.  We learned this several meetings ago
when one of the containers got lost.  A quick look at the ICANN budget
suggests that even though they are roughly the same size as our meetings,
typically 1000 people, they cost twice as much.  (This is the cost.  Their
meeting revenue is deliberately zero so it's not comparable.)

I'm pretty sure this is not a direction that the IETF would like to go.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email