Re: [106attendees] Accessibility for remote participants

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983DB120805 for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:17:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCqATSdIP0Hh for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 651A1120820 for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAKMH6sF031313; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:17:45 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=97prKqmKDNV4YjnSPa0FRrPP8IXxwfb7BaFxNNw5hUI=; b=V9Uhd1WqH9mi8/N2TC+j4fDNyXwizCR9Nat5aT+3BPP97TcVLYwRKSSvVyFuJcBnDMjb 8YherPO+2PJX+nztebc2+q8MbCdWUuSsZfarMvqe5qBbVSedXovFWIN44UDGq5S+QehJ 1QObvRhMnHf926UCtSRMSlhb/cC+ibH09Bly5g8g+0L1yMnD6PG+f82Z01TH5s0zPljN fYqgPoh6xKI5oDdPk+MOTdY0RLNWT7z6dBYsJL1UaGfUeWaUG7kUVSd1fLKZkShWSYZ4 jxoO62v68r/gEtEIB6kyJrCE3PsvFsDK99PHM1J7vF3ePs6IVFjsB9UK0AIt6rRjXzbz Bw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wafutvcu2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:17:45 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAKMHKTR012196; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:17:44 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wadaynek2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:17:44 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:17:43 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:17:43 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>, Geoff Lanotte <geofflanotte@gmail.com>
CC: "106attendees@ietf.org" <106attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [106attendees] Accessibility for remote participants
Thread-Index: AQHVn+ogH25bnItJi0iCErv9olG5waeU6/EAgACOzwA=
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:17:43 +0000
Message-ID: <90263A48-CCBD-43CA-AA19-519E3C78664F@akamai.com>
References: <CABZ0mu63tS3o9XMWBFcVm8ARt71KZCVZ8xXGN=sFCiEZzqdwWA@mail.gmail.com> <73B864DC-958E-4C7A-8420-A5F767CA6CDE@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <73B864DC-958E-4C7A-8420-A5F767CA6CDE@puck.nether.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1f.0.191110
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.216.64]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3D7B886F453EB449B2C737BC40CB3804@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-20_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1911200189
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-20_07:2019-11-20,2019-11-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=998 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911200188
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/DL-jB-1n_8BVpoHKASaSe7Ih2_w>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Accessibility for remote participants
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:17:50 -0000

>    The key thing for me is that we should be ensuring the conversations are happening on-list vs rapid-fire at a microphone.

Hoping this doesn't start an endless thread about "should we meet at all", I'll just say I disagree because this starts down a slope.  Shall we ensure hallway conversations also happen on-list?