Re: [106attendees] Power strips ?

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 06:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82B412009C for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:12:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3GAnf7446qZQ for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:12:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F1F12006F for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:12:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-8a04.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8a04.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A26522421173; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:12:23 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVAwhMget-Y9ns4MjD=4nQ6RmZfwEQyvK=EnBeDpsjXoFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:12:19 +0000
Cc: "106attendees@ietf.org" <106attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C9EF520-DD55-4C66-9766-B4E72243CCB6@rfc1035.com>
References: <B6A3DDD2-D1A4-4F5D-8E49-E5932A693069@seantek.com> <2297BFD1-57A8-46AB-A647-4A78289C2A21@voltanet.io> <20191121035434.GL2287@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4c80fe8e-680e-5710-0c69-5c638cdbfe54@sit.fraunhofer.de> <CAC4RtVAwhMget-Y9ns4MjD=4nQ6RmZfwEQyvK=EnBeDpsjXoFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/PXsQ2-hc8DwMTCavbIhGaadIZsg>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Power strips ?
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:12:27 -0000


> On 21 Nov 2019, at 05:54, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> Hotels & conference centres vary in that: some charge significantly
> more to deploy *your* power strips than *theirs* -- one wonders why,
> but there it is.

This is just another of the many variables in the way venues charge for their space. If you squeeze them on the cost of snacks (or whatever), the venue will find some way to recover that elsewhere.

A venue generally decides how much money they'll collect for an event and no matter how the meeting organisers split out the line items in their budget, it will always add up to whatever was the venue's target amount. If they charge us more for using our power strips we might be getting cheaper/more coffee or something like that in exchange.