Re: [106attendees] Power strips ?

Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> Thu, 21 November 2019 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <olejacobsen@me.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368B6120980 for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:15:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=me.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQVQPyz7BmsG for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com (st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com [17.58.63.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822BF12087F for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:15:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1574331326; bh=Jef9C7O6bzQmUyf7tDT747Q5uKV/aQNuGKEP225tiG0=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=oFAJgMvpVBK2AuK8IjjBi+uys7YY2K3DFQOLEGmIP8UCwwb/uI8l2ZlWUDCL1gKXs qQcpjPcSBfce0hMDbKeSYQX/Tp3FC/aWaQGyvS/+tC4CwU7LvNq593qQhxRMHGek1A TaagaYSfVodDz7wcqIKYgPxk+sn6yn7bkDkC05OhB0Eqcl6mM6suiB24Lmbl0N15Wx 2zfv6HEKfb6zEcQ1M6RszBk9bMJEkjUalXuQ9w/ePZT2aH31PfQycWk1lvBtwxzl/3 tOUo91ZHFX5y0Lg85FVGHwsJUxWPp7ihbWoaQ90W0/GS8uTiY6DMNwEalEo46rd+9T IQrwJS6l/W0qg==
Received: from [100.90.175.253] (unknown [172.58.139.70]) by st43p00im-ztfb10061701.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7ED9AC17DD; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:15:25 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-EE391C1A-3D01-4226-83D9-E600B1354240
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191121100045.GR2287@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:02:31 +0800
Cc: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen=40me.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "106attendees@ietf.org" <106attendees@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <33BEE04A-82C2-4F7A-B4A3-9C32E2CB2CA1@me.com>
References: <20191121100045.GR2287@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17B111)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-21_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=841 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911210092
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/WRsb6AoSdsBiE02NxbiaYunhzM8>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Power strips ?
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:15:29 -0000

Then you have not counted the NUMBER of strips deployed!  :-)

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor & Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Cell: +1 415 370-4628
T-Mobile: +1 415 889-9821
Docomo: +81 90 3337 9311‬
http://protocoljournal.org

Sent from my iPhone

> On 21 Nov 2019, at 18:01, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:06:01PM +0800, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>> The universal power strips are both legal and common in most of Asia. The ???best??? ones have a power tail plugin for the part that goes to the wall, so you carry the strip plus local power cable. We got a bunch of these for APRICOT years ago and shipped them from venue to venue along with our routers an WiFi kit.
>> 
>> But, honestly, personal one-port adapters work just fine. I don???t really see a need to
>> burden the secretariat with more stuff.
> 
> I was hope we could simply attach them to the network gear shipment,
> where they shoud be a minor part and then let whoever installs the
> power-strips into meeing rooms these day use those poewr strips.
> Aka: this shouldn't involve secretariat.
> 
> Cheers
>    Toerless
> 
>> These adapters (UK version shown) are my personal favorites. They have a universal ???face??? and localized plug PLUS a splitter for US/EU:
>> 
>> AC POWER TRAVEL ADAPTER PLUG FOR UNITED KINGDOM UK ENGLAND IRELAND SCOTLAND MALAYSIA HONG KONG / WITH DUAL PLUG-IN PORTS AND SURGE PROTECTION / GROUNDED
>> 
>> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00349OSOS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_GkL1Db3C8WQ7V
>> 
>> 
>> Ole J. Jacobsen
>> Editor & Publisher
>> The Internet Protocol Journal
>> Cell: +1 415 370-4628
>> T-Mobile: +1 415 889-9821
>> Docomo: +81 90 3337 9311???
>> http://protocoljournal.org
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On 21 Nov 2019, at 15:15, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ???
>>>> 
>>>> I suspect venue isn???t going to allow power strips that aren???t approved in their country.
>>>> Too much legal and safety risks for them.
>>>> 
>>>> To me this would create a lot  of complexity and cost for the secretariat and the IETF.
>>>> Not really warranted.  My plug adapters work fine.
>>> 
>>> As I noted, ICANN does it, and it works.  We could find out from them
>>> what sorts of costs and approvals are involved, but they don't seem to
>>> have problems with their not being allowed.
>>> 
>>> Barry
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 106attendees mailing list
>>> 106attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees
> 
>> -- 
>> 106attendees mailing list
>> 106attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> tte@cs.fau.de
> 
> -- 
> 106attendees mailing list
> 106attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees