Re: [107attendees] IETF 107 special thanks, useful links and survey

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 30 March 2020 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356973A0141 for <107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g59Ax-6J4yyj for <107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D9A3A0140 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5FD3897A; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:58:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164D4451; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:59:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, 107attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <edec2cfd-19b8-717d-604e-2305ca27ddf9@cea.fr>
References: <158535905529.17793.3182522651567280438@ietfa.amsl.com> <edec2cfd-19b8-717d-604e-2305ca27ddf9@cea.fr>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:59:38 -0400
Message-ID: <3066.1585587578@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/CrKqVb6rJMRuVuwGK77mBN8We8o>
Subject: Re: [107attendees] IETF 107 special thanks, useful links and survey
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:59:50 -0000

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> wrote:
    > I might be the only to wonder these things, but here:

    > How were the dates selected?

I understand that each session slot was turned into a day, on the assumption
that the slots were as well de-conflicted as possible.

    > Basically, I wonder whether there will be doodles about virtual meeting
    > dates. The doodles could offer to select a date, or to select a periodicity
    > (e.g.once in three months), or something else similar.

This is happening in nearly every single WG ML list, and has been for more
than a week.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-