Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Mon, 30 March 2020 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706CE3A1064 for <107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 01:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8YwNo6j2iSe for <107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 01:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 663773A1062 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 01:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02U89jWo025721 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:45 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D7B1C2010D0 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D0C2008E9 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.242.51] ([10.11.242.51]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02U89jx9000418 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:45 +0200
To: 107attendees@ietf.org
References: <CAKKJt-eCsg4v2kawrDAYy3StYE=SEVDVQfqngZfO6PD0o1Tswg@mail.gmail.com> <CCA52B2C-A856-4814-83DF-58A012AB63BA@fugue.com> <CA+9_gVvSvdocYSsw-FEAFrAL8Fq--CQpRj2OFJfvUVx6PjBrTA@mail.gmail.com> <7316D61D-A962-4943-BF02-FC676D671219@icloud.com> <6c578ff5-2870-7b86-6590-7ab01f944376@htt-consult.com> <20200328034611.GZ50174@kduck.mit.edu> <11945.1585499962@localhost>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <f75b1a18-fea4-3a33-ea43-68defa9f1865@cea.fr>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:09:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <11945.1585499962@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090201000303020503010908"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/OJIlXigVo7rRQzeEVf3LIFywEIs>
Subject: Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:09:51 -0000

Le 29/03/2020 à 18:39, Michael Richardson a écrit :
> Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
>      >> I hope that after this week, there will be some good work in wringing
>      >> out the bumps and making test enviornments available.  Also if wg's
>      >> interim virtual meetings were to use Jabber, more people will gain the
>      >> needed skillls to guide new comers.
>
>      > I will note that this meeting seems to have had enough load to induce
>      > severe lag and maybe even full-on disconnections.  I am regularly in jabber
>      > and hold a weekly meeting via jabber, but had to frantically engage an
>      > alternate solution because my normal setup was not getting me all the
>      > traffic in a timely fashion.  (I saw a couple other people comment about
>      > lag, too, so at least that part is not just me.)
>
> I once saw a 2 minute lag in seeing my comments echo back.
> All the traffic showed up for me, eventually.


I confirm about that lag, me too.

The problem is also the text I just typed disappears from the screen and 
appears in the discussion window only after that lag. It is confusing.

Alex, LF/HF 2

>
> I think it was during plenary.
> I don't know if there was a new TCP session or not, it didn't persist long
> enough for me to investigate, but I certainly did notice and was perplexed.
>
> I didn't remember it until reading your comment.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>   -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>