Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1599F3A0F4E for <107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFChdp7sP2ud for <107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 925513A0F56 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id d11so11753738qko.3 for <107attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2zSp0IbE4JRCRK+U+VYPV6MqkZsYn3B/PyO2+0OVGGI=; b=qVR97E4s712Es0eMU6ihimFODyV1Y0gpKc/JPVgyLVlPFoj0gey4MNCvZvdYhARGCJ WIX6PpaSZh7eC1819Dx9U/jEbuTaT1IWvUdOCwgoY1jbnsWJHl9EZ/EUrWZ2qHDdhzic X9E/Fg11HCvgmi000uSke+hQQxS7O6dm4Ye8J/3JYjJyS3fK6TMNHp/qv4uuBVcPAidX l8FescYw5S6LZfAa8NoRxZs4eEdUq81cdxJx5AUfrFrVEf9otZmCM8w70Oo1ZVQ9X0Z2 cBY9p2V+V94dk2oDJJEqMzlc092AOA1iZWatMxHhCJ/iDLLgf5eRfytktszjc05a15gO gLRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2zSp0IbE4JRCRK+U+VYPV6MqkZsYn3B/PyO2+0OVGGI=; b=qSIXt6PC0W848imgMYrDQJm0kQ0xCLBAbK7tckgXauuNWO4GFTewUWtEfbp3EN0Vr1 JtXGSD3FPHa5L40LzHBdYSyxz2onPjOjfG87uuwidfsyVu8eHhDPrwdb8RwLmuEkbRkm WJ0EFAOC47v9F29xaLOM3ONgyFsjx0ZqYBn1NXuWmINpJI5p1wJCbMc5VKYpmgd3AjZN jHftlXxT0VdWkClpq+3nx7+tydOW3gEpatjnjNO8Yz3Vnp/TaDPijx9a/jWxMtolGJjy r1rILTsg05E9R/BODVrPPTGH5ReA00194au+aVcaT7wq9SnmKS2scbAB7v3FPjFO1fAi RrXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3r5guGd2jG2hV2c3IzfX47+1Y+MfKtPpZ0fCSgCMcFNApq2HPO 5i7xfyZgPWVJjoK4wrtVi8sSdw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsTJebwHiqaGqFZcfMH+XLdmSyzcVZ9te7Dsl3Bz9FYwXDTNvofMSlqy8JsTAXlLTPFR6YXug==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:958:: with SMTP id w24mr481282qkw.347.1585331489465; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 207sm4216199qkj.41.2020.03.27.10.51.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <810E012D-C5F8-446D-8626-9F33F0099F08@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_50B961B1-C148-4DC4-88AD-99AF02AB5753"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3622.0.6\))
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:51:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4B602675-A4FB-4794-B3EA-F4D39BA6D5D7@icloud.com>
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, 107attendees@ietf.org, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Carrick Bartle <cbartle891@icloud.com>
References: <CAKKJt-eCsg4v2kawrDAYy3StYE=SEVDVQfqngZfO6PD0o1Tswg@mail.gmail.com> <CCA52B2C-A856-4814-83DF-58A012AB63BA@fugue.com> <4B602675-A4FB-4794-B3EA-F4D39BA6D5D7@icloud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3622.0.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/Rb9tT68MWNnbQvxevCcnSaT3asw>
Subject: Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:51:43 -0000

On Mar 27, 2020, at 1:10 PM, Carrick Bartle <cbartle891@icloud.com> wrote:
> What do you mean by "point and click”?

I mean that when you click on the light bulb icon in the agenda, it pulls up a new tab in your browser that contains the chat session for the meeting.

Right now, on my iPad or Mac, clicking on that link brings up a fairly random app that I guess claims to serve the jabber:// <jabber://> protocol but in fact does nothing.  I installed three different apps before I found one that actually worked (many thanks to Glen Barney for putting up the informational page on this, BTW).  The one that worked provided no feedback when I entered meeting@jabber.ietf.org <mailto:meeting@jabber.ietf.org> where it expected “meeting” and accepted the default jabber server where I should have typed jabber.ietf.org <http://jabber.ietf.org/>.  At this point I gave up and didn’t try again until the next meeting, when I finally had a brainstorm that turned out to be correct as to what to type.  The UI gave me no clue that there was a problem—I simply wasn’t in the jabber room and didn’t see the conversation.

This is a total usability fail.  Only people who really, really want to use Jabber, or who have been using it for years and understand it well, will be able to make it work.   I think that’s why a relatively limited number of people participated on jabber as compared to webex, where in order to join I just clicked on the URL and was immediately in the meeting room.