Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...

Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A685E3A0878; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuBZjGhwoqHQ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40883A07BA; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id x16so9781879ilp.12; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p5FV2P07W2armv3L8ls1hmh/tE0nkeenI4vQ6JdoOo8=; b=o0t1IPPhO8xuEWZNnxcV/NNaSlFdstpiEFmXwiGCvrjSYYwdvyrrZhVGUFlEZGgpjK KWH46mvReDfFny2NOYAAP/x5IcrRaPa1lrwZcDi9tmDyJDqHSJXwtxdUCD8DPLw/BXwe ILRcPtvSWfT3Gb+6ziRjbQQH5fCSrbyAV7KltP5ze4kJdLvA72EdtMU8n8IMlGOVlkB6 pORTi9z/hdxleOx3+5LheEcIl7xkZyJl//dRA2Lvwdz3QzE9JbqWL1Vzak0+tzVzxykO nNBGxifo+/Eg5H+6BzCFYJ42fJfrvZuMd8OyJNKDRhCsszmxSyE1elaVtU0g8AvV+BXS bpWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p5FV2P07W2armv3L8ls1hmh/tE0nkeenI4vQ6JdoOo8=; b=Mb6pu9SuMYxGsxM6lXZBO24N4TRUgLhzMUJ+RHF3ZGbKh0TUv4f3PmXeUAZYfSpCUN CFqwghHWcT38nHGBvMqMp4oicBgvaCOFekHwl3dGEysNIvOKSC9cJ9Hm45SGzDEntrob FFrXHR280sxJyw7tpH2E9RhXiOx2TvVdOFxtcMxsHedpvLJotfCSAgIX4cNgp8WRcBy/ zat2uhyqPKOsvqaDIgSSw19tKRmuxHHjBEAAqMJyCM9HFrmKdrq2dW0ABAl9yZeKE0wt yp0WYMHMv+Meb7buiiIVB2Snoj92FP0mcJqejwM4Ir60u2XTasstQMccah1jZJCiALOX CeSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3L9XzXqTNXFLQvA59yvkFPzqzWuVN7QdxUi5flQe/enzBnNifF 3F7F/Y54JATh+GVVr4FmnV/vLYU0lN5zqSptK15t5w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvxCdC425FOYZE++6xclS+XtVdWDXA9k1kMQt7orPQzArvF0BZW8SzTRkvSOyhSUgFb/JR3VC57J1/iMCXMqAM=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:3b8c:: with SMTP id n12mr607879ilh.186.1585335934042; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKKJt-eCsg4v2kawrDAYy3StYE=SEVDVQfqngZfO6PD0o1Tswg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eCsg4v2kawrDAYy3StYE=SEVDVQfqngZfO6PD0o1Tswg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:05:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CABmDk8kEG95Ho7f3=6Fv1sW11+Sh0uw=Dnj40s=n63rEK_2n_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: 107attendees@ietf.org, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032f83a05a1dac975"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/TWsiQbbmgX9qURNR_ygcWbqDFjk>
Subject: Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:05:37 -0000

I had problems with Jabber so didn't see all that chatter. ISTM that since
we are recording sessions, it might be much better to have the chat in the
Webex, so that it's recorded. So, ISTM that running the queue in Jabber
might be a better option.

Regards,
Mary.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:28 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've heard almost every session chairs saying words like "we have X people
> who have signed the bluesheets, and 2X people who are in WebEx now, please
> go sign the bluesheet". So that's fine.
>
> But I'm also noticing that there are about X people in Jabber, and
> honestly, this week, the jabber rooms are incredibly active - probably
> because they're playing the part of hallway discussions for each session.
> That's been especially true for BOFs, but almost every session has had a
> non-stop active jabber room for most/all of the session.
>
> There are a lot of conversations there, that aren't making it into the
> mike line, so roughly half the people in WebEx aren't seeing them, and in
> the cases I'm familiar with, the jabber conversation has been at least as
> well-informed and serious as the voice conversation. And the voice
> conversation doesn't always end up in the same place as the jabber
> conversation.
>
> Are other people noticing the same thing?
>
> Best,
>
> Spencer
>