Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A070B3A0B0D for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eA5OOKrAZZgy for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898753A0B0C for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1k1bZI-0002lv-Ux; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:23:53 +0000
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:23:48 -0700
Message-ID: <m27dujh1rf.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Cc: 108attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2FB39597-ED4A-4070-805E-B81FDA9461DD@gmail.com>
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <18dc9d9f-cdb3-e85b-5504-db0d41c44707@network-heretics.com> <MN2PR19MB4045D4865D9823FAFBCCDCAF834E0@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <2FB39597-ED4A-4070-805E-B81FDA9461DD@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/0hcoJPOCVF3dJBhQ4XMdoPcbGQU>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:23:57 -0000

> I think it deserves higher praise that that.  I’ll go so far as to
> say: it’s better (for us) than Zoom.

i think it was webex last time.  and meetecho was much better indeed.

i have not been in a zoom conference with more than a couple of hundred,
e.g. pam, so can not say how it would scale to ietf style.  but i am in
a too darned many zoom conferences daily, webex once a week, and the
microsoft whatever rarely.

meetecho is adapted well to the ietf modes and needs.  those modes and
needs could change if our corporate culture stops trying to reproduce
the physical meetings and gets hip to this internet thing.

next week, defcon/blackhat will be interesting.  i will spin up a
scratch laptop with which to participate, and wipe or destroy it
afterward.

randy