Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net> Fri, 31 July 2020 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <carlos@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1CB3A07B3 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6CLSUlVk9SjA for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [200.7.84.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38713A0544 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lacnic.net.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id E794216B40664; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:25:41 -0300 (UYT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lacnic.net.uy
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy ([127.0.0.1]) by hermes.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3pWYNlsC0qXE; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:25:41 -0300 (UYT)
Received: from [200.10.62.136] (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:2128:3da7:cf46:9405:1199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1754516B404B6; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:25:41 -0300 (UYT)
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
To: "Bob Hinden" <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: 108attendees@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:25:40 -0300
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <B3649916-AEFD-4A97-8974-FEB9B9DD3A8B@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com>
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_A3389F6C-8D93-4B0E-9ED2-E75BC88D8F46_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/2R8iWfaR_T1_DwlLPQ5uieQ1eiA>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:25:46 -0000

+1, I think it was a productive and useful meeting.

A special word for the ANRW. I found most of the talks very interesting. I believe it complements the main IETF program very well.

/Carlos

Carlos M. Martinez
CTO - Gerente de Tecnología
LACNIC

On 31 Jul 2020, at 16:20, Bob Hinden wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to thanks everyone involved it putting together IETF 108.  Overall, I think everything worked out very well.  While I don’t think it was a productive as a face to face meeting, given we can’t do that, it was very good.   I say that even though I had a few sessions that started at 4am local time for me :-)
>
> Kudos to AMS, Meetecho, NOC Team, tools team, w.g. chairs, IESG, and everyone else involved.
>
> I suspect we will get to do this again in November.
>
> Bob
>
> -- 
> 108attendees mailing list
> 108attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees