Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Sun, 02 August 2020 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C583A0B30 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NcBuyNks9aQq for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2E03A0B2F for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D9B548438; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 04:59:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 05DFA440059; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 04:59:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 04:59:24 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown=40jisc.ac.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "108attendees@ietf.org" <108attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200802025924.GH1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <3b9cc8e5-a9f2-cc44-8fc5-6b7649e43343@cs.tcd.ie> <392F9FEA-BA4A-4E57-B80D-D5B288B9887A@jisc.ac.uk> <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/4rQFVXIbUQtqLQqnGGnZbS1zcJM>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 03:10:10 -0000

On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 11:40:44AM -0700, Christian Huitema wrote:
> The time zone was very difficult for me. The 7:00am sessions were easy
> enough. I thought that I could wake up at 3:30am for a 4:00am session
> (11:00 UTC), and I did that once. But then I needed 2 days to recover,
> probably because I am not 20 anymore. I wish we had a good way to
> organize asynchronous conversations with higher bandwidth than email,
> but more time flexibility than video conferences.

I was suggesting on manycouches to encourage more use of pre-recorded video clips
for all those parts of sessions where thats feasible. Watch them in
your own time zone in the week before IETF. Reduces the amount of time
we need synchronously during IETF week.

Of course: Seems to widely depend on the individual RG/WG whether such asynchronuous
ToI is a larger or minor part of the time spent in the group.

Would be nice if meetecho had stats. If we accounted all the time
where individual speakers talked for more than 2 minutes as better done
via a pre-recorded clip, how much would that be ?

Cheers
    Toerless

> -- Christian Huitema