Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091AB3A048A for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=ZLvgxSdS; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bfMf/1S5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrTt_aMyiGfS for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4853A046E for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE3C5C01A9 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 22:18:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=eYz9+JQ ScUxXmjr/8brQkfSoaJdQEABJrIEOcn6wGKw=; b=ZLvgxSdSLm7+kYnREdG9e6o uKlDpH1h8B6gzUITGCRAosUBJo6ZAQX0b1yL5QY04x4axRwzs05dzlVHn/DAqEnS ZeE42dJBs73DPVA4VvxsiVvNU0zedO4U9vmFbhYcpNUPDmmRhlPfTb5XLxlA4GE8 amYnUUpR1aMBOOIOvg42EGFjt0hCFTKjpdzUN5Rr7wNbsqLeBO7eQ56IY6UQj1bn v9eIO6wxgsa/Dq/+CmuBZx5mbz5igmffzdLU5vlWcH7DvMJnnGyQTuf8mM6mHz7P 6x4P3qlHp7jIyajrMaIqerTUVxDJVwg94IcThuA2sd0PN36Ke9ryqeKNXRx9W9g= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=eYz9+J QScUxXmjr/8brQkfSoaJdQEABJrIEOcn6wGKw=; b=bfMf/1S5RY8hK+Bq6UOu/R BfdXWy1p2O/CFfUxkFDQ9SMO9GFljbMhBKJOVx3CCjy9B5rbajYKW9n/mEPngmop Fk4/QDnaa8ixdhtcKTm3tkzGkc5VzRnDjYyhFmhBR+Rgih+Q8tOmReOvJY2uSlVw uxxSohcE3oYLjnugy/XulsBzF/NLwJPQAxb1xre54c4kIf7R1khW6ERvLP4YaGqU YDaQzP8GorlrqoM+SRzdUBkwBcXwNwpxq28HmsmQANRLqylBP98IUYPZmWFXpvbl jm0HKMVhJUaJuFWeRc46X0n/qa4PQvsmM2UaPwegAEg89HrN2cI0vv8hye2BNlxA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:a8UoX8JwdABWAdV9twQSusin07IqsxituaY67WImrvb8zCxS2QfwRQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeehgdehjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtre erreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehteegfeevte duffevteehfffghefhvdevkeeuhfehueetudehgfegieekjeetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:a8UoX8JqsEXMnt12e6E4dSL8K1Cp-JZQAs1Bzfw3xjI9xMUZW2QyPA> <xmx:a8UoX8sYQMpJrlXgNg_AB6ouOGN9yQ6M3TvkKZzMtp8wjUBe--30Og> <xmx:a8UoX5ZcmN3uu_VJkKes_bU1B_6L_ptcWwTVxUlJlvm4lylHvw5voA> <xmx:a8UoX7p6bvB3Uw4O-Au4FiqDDYw8bRcjtQK1Xs84rCLPEKDMNCuY9g>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6EF261804C6; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-136-gc39b634-fm-20200803.001-gc39b6340
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <78c2bda7-ccf5-44f0-9520-f012d6949180@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337767597051839FE069836C14D0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <3b9cc8e5-a9f2-cc44-8fc5-6b7649e43343@cs.tcd.ie> <392F9FEA-BA4A-4E57-B80D-D5B288B9887A@jisc.ac.uk> <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net> <20200802025924.GH1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3C71AFFA-E6D5-446C-B20A-C35B1EB8FFDF@nostrum.com> <m2eeoog2fr.wl-randy@psg.com> <BY5PR11MB4337767597051839FE069836C14D0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:17:59 +1000
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: 108attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=d89d089d1f2440628cc7e75b7221300f
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/63CJZDIc7fquUIfvch9KGP2VVI8>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 02:18:22 -0000

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 03:27, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> FWIW, perhaps we should rethink the traditional meeting agenda.

>  

> Today pretty much everyone does:

>  

>  * Present the slides I published 24 hours before the meeting
>  * In the time left for my slot (little to none because agendas are usually full) entertain questions/discussion
>  

> Instead, don’t present slides at all (still prepare/publish them – and have them available if needed for reference). Each “presenter” gets 10-15 minutes to simply take questions/have discussion – the interactive things that have added value when done “face-to-face”.

> This would use meeting time to do what cannot be done as easily “on the list”. 


There's an assumption in here that the presenting of the slides doesn't have any benefit, which I don't believe is true.

As the presenter talks through the slides they are aligning the thoughts of everybody in the room (including themselves) and hence when we get to the conversation, everybody has the cache state loaded into their brain and the conversation can be productive.  I don't think that "read the slides in advance and come with questions" will give the same alignment.

I'm not saying "there's not better way", but it's worth considering the positives of the existing patterns and seeing how we can preserve them.

Bron


--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com