Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 04 August 2020 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C5A3A0BC6 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQn9VkFiY_lH for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05963A0BC0 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.101] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BLcNt4zcjzydX; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:20:46 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <814108A0-084C-4241-BEB8-68245E1A8B28@chopps.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:20:46 +0200
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, Antoni Przygienda <prz=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "108attendees@ietf.org" <108attendees@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 618243645.8751709-2f99de7d7378765f796eaf49a3e2f33f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8B5599E0-6C6A-45CA-823B-353B68E0582A@tzi.org>
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <3b9cc8e5-a9f2-cc44-8fc5-6b7649e43343@cs.tcd.ie> <392F9FEA-BA4A-4E57-B80D-D5B288B9887A@jisc.ac.uk> <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net> <20200802025924.GH1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3C71AFFA-E6D5-446C-B20A-C35B1EB8FFDF@nostrum.com> <m2eeoog2fr.wl-randy@psg.com> <BY5PR11MB4337767597051839FE069836C14D0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <78c2bda7-ccf5-44f0-9520-f012d6949180@dogfood.fastmail.com> <8DEC8E1B-CA6F-4F18-BA4B-777EA401EDDC@chopps.org> <661693A8-DC49-4EF8-8FB4-66C760B6E971@juniper.net> <DC3243F3-6911-462E-B064-ED4AA6FCF919@ericsson.com> <814108A0-084C-4241-BEB8-68245E1A8B28@chopps.org>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/CTlEeQ7Lzu2nZGhBb2NJQAFp-Mk>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:20:52 -0000

On 2020-08-04, at 16:08, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
> 
> I do not agree with people who want to move from in person to "meeting only online", the reasons to meet in person have been enumerated countless times on the IETF discussion list, yet the push to eliminate the in person meetings continue despite this. Who would want to have this same debate ad nauseam in a WG?

Well, the “only” apparently was backfilled to avoid the WG name being a slur in certain contexts.

I’m not sure the semantic implication of this change was intended — “meet mostly online” would have the same problem.

The charter https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/shmoo/about/

includes:

»The cadence of meeting scheduling and the mix of in-person versus fully
online meetings going forward once the disruptions caused by the pandemic
have subsided.«

So those of us who like to have that mix of face-to-face meetings and Web meetings will need to pay attention.

Grüße, Carsten