Re: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 29 July 2020 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5564A3A0F25; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24tsQ-T27UvV; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC223A0F0F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960E7548048; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 23:24:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 8045C440043; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 23:24:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 23:24:25 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 108attendees@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200729212425.GL1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <C992207C-96DF-47B5-8927-C150E4380D94@gmail.com> <DAD7BBEB-4A79-4D0C-8F62-E7BFEB320E0B@fugue.com> <F6E1304C-7ED8-4583-9FF4-DB52E8318332@gmail.com> <8E587F95-744E-4E6F-A3F9-76B9D02BA5D4@fugue.com> <616BBD78-2982-4399-9DFC-2DC5D2D67EEB@gmail.com> <A68DE609-18FC-4DA6-8CD0-755291258374@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A68DE609-18FC-4DA6-8CD0-755291258374@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/FAsTxzBVjEIOdkSBU-2z1sZNzcY>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:24:35 -0000

a) click response options:
   
    no-hum / hand-down         (0.00)
    weak hum                   (0.25)
    medium-hum / hand wiggling (0.50)
    strong-hum                 (0.75)
    max-hum / hand up          (1.00)

b) real-time reporting of time-elapsed/#responses/#attendees

b) chair click: to stop after whatever time she thinks appropriate
   reports (to all):

     #responses / avg-responses / sum-responses  (#attendees / time-elapsed)

Is this getting us closer to having a single report mechanism that solves
all queries we want ? At least hum and show-of-hands ?

For counting hands up, we want sum-responses, for humming we want average

Cheers
    Toerless

P.S.: i already fail talking italian at starbucks to order the right size drink,
i am not sure i would ever figure out the meaning of the different  italian volume levels.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 05:07:17PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 4:54 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No, of course not.   However, we might come to a different conclusion if only a few people respond, rather than many.
> > I think we need something similar for the virtual hum.
> 
> I think you are right.
>