Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB46D3A0A12 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZ6ISeRpgX9l for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36373A0A80 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id g26so38794340qka.3 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SWVa5KJPB6iKWON9mPkqTK7B2ro0FhIe9kRXtDjsvTg=; b=G6eSmOCVZROLQAg5JEKk2WWpdFtFLJXqkILpXY/hP05VgY2wPLNldQApJrgP0m8yWE wqFgrdPMZkOu45mIdiE7FqduxiF2Yr2sTqyRV3m0BXRibnklUOvgkmMBrVN9xBn01GpK mwDE2Ho49fzKvZXb2zA+yKKKseGw7DVdG4ltDOuKehcrtLxPlFhwegIp43ktMJd2//Df py+FpkEXLT3/id6NAW7BZ4XzAZr+VWbJ232/mjgeimnareOINJ8mEoYx+a3ud0ETvmZ4 1Nrl7NU9lYTEJJzNC++quMQBxBiW3f9P+EU+2LAKpU9BBe0lwvLtSA0oVVidVP0IgA5X I86A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SWVa5KJPB6iKWON9mPkqTK7B2ro0FhIe9kRXtDjsvTg=; b=ea+cDDp6fp3wRQtNhGyx+yOyzY6OtmnidvZ7DpIIgqDrkUQoMbCRt1n2p/gJwwgKcT foDAWuWliEXFZUuAeYBTGAe+dyC6aCbFNKDtPNJLjKMiddZlhCDHK5PvudWEBu0vAyPm psDOBYNq3fWuVn6Q8SBLmH33AmrTysmwvAuYpMvJHsUJwkjG+CWwSu8QE2Ca0Yzgq3XI oyqCCQSphd5r6zSHhKjVDG3dXtg70VHYV5lXW4honx7RhUJR7/13oN8bkzx3fA5iuw6y PVwNYBioLECb/kg0V5gOduvOzn3ofCxvj6DhiUaFDVil7cXAIf4DY8WE9F06U1sLgOf8 rvdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jseVUZfn8+f9IO/5Bgva8o/wQ6LW0j9uWOs5QrBSbpqSfnp0G 52ZS8X+DDGN5xklLff98xemLug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdrMWSm7v6Y2Mp/MsbkY1ViM7i32GXpD9QZnIA4w9gT4mRuzdk9wyc4swL5MR4JkSrn7tU1A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4f6:: with SMTP id b22mr21496367qkh.67.1596555210065; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:bc4f:dd7f:d316:5243? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:bc4f:dd7f:d316:5243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m66sm20955651qkf.86.2020.08.04.08.33.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <03BB9DF9-C969-4F3A-9203-EB520798AC63@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 11:33:27 -0400
Cc: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com>, "108attendees@ietf.org" <108attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2FEA54A3-AA60-45D9-9837-9B8F3C435207@fugue.com>
References: <8843AF5A-A5D2-46B1-9A04-A7473F768FB3@juniper.net> <AAE1AC4C-FC21-4797-A816-44C616002486@fugue.com> <03BB9DF9-C969-4F3A-9203-EB520798AC63@juniper.net>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/JNLG-JZ7XIhgzsvh8V2QiyHGK8Q>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:34:56 -0000

On Aug 4, 2020, at 11:27 AM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>> 
>> As far as I understand it, “only” is as opposed to “partly”. That is, as opposed to an in-person meeting with online participants.
> 
> Yes, I understand that this is said to be the intent of the name. It’s indisputable that the name doesn’t communicate clearly; a name you have to explain is a poor name, in this case the poor choice has real-world consequences.
> 
>> I’m a pretty strong advocate of learning how to get the benefit of in-person meetings online, both because it saves carbon and because it allows more participants. And yet I would not advocate never meeting in person.
> 
> Sure.
> 
>> It might serve the community better if we could be less polarized about this..
> 
> You addressed your comment to me, but I’m not sure what your point is, I’m sorry.

This last sentence is rather ironic when compared to your first.  “It’s indisputable?”