Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics

John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 02:22 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA463A0AE4 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=dn1TC4Ws; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=WU/rujk5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-uUCuGN9BXH for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 014253A0ADF for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46950 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2020 02:22:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=b764.5f1f8bf3.k2007; bh=S8jDUL5DLQRmF0DA3teXdFvvHv+FXLwUvcuEby4M53o=; b=dn1TC4Ws3obkeWWBqKwatqD7kEo84QNV571Mp/xfaa4/rtbT5rBVs1I/BpiewcgBCUNWcpVXbPE9vByzx7tLiOG++JUnwAyxJed4zVSQoowmcZv3kSF2AIknzCKdYoamaqaLYoWFPb4qswLMaic3I+VM/Y7pXoe1fQhABKnD8RSza6TJtw6U4QeVQEmCPqItxjD+2/dC4sXhdHCv4QmdZmY5iFYHyuv04ozuY6wY6doh9ZE0P3Wsc05Kc7Owmq12
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=b764.5f1f8bf3.k2007; bh=S8jDUL5DLQRmF0DA3teXdFvvHv+FXLwUvcuEby4M53o=; b=WU/rujk51FOn+lkvuLu/FmE0PCyuxgSdGalQNcjzYo3zgWCL27OQD2cYt9vbDBykqKmbgHD5Ld7wDckm9aGj2ocfNMq0zY9wann4RE7DUpHQNASYD86xwTBUs6t8R5WkdKl4+0fwnhvpCAwGfce7B25Oj3Yq12W3E0aaKzvSXL/qvHqvJcckzHCndDZm4YMy5fquBycEeBgSBvdOnvmPo6N2lrWZFZx09OnAsrJLWKY6wKbxf76XOSpYXmfzcEg0
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 28 Jul 2020 02:22:43 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1C67D1D93E0A; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:22:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:22:43 -0400
Message-Id: <20200728022243.1C67D1D93E0A@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: 108attendees@ietf.org
Cc: huitema@huitema.net
In-Reply-To: <69dbc66f-2c41-2b0f-c15a-7c361f591244@huitema.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/PkPjfsZA_uY2h-hZa5FvUDBl-XU>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Meetecho participant pics
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 02:22:47 -0000

In article <69dbc66f-2c41-2b0f-c15a-7c361f591244@huitema.net> you write:
>I read John's message stating that this is a benign service from
>Wordpress, a byproduct of their need to identify posters of comments on
>their blogging service. That may well be, but this is still a third
>party tracker. There is nothing that technically prevent Wordpress to
>change the terms and monetize the data in the future. Let's hope that
>Meetecho may be able to react quickly in that case.

Given that Gravatar has been around for 13 years and is doing exactly
the same thing now that it was 13 years ago, and that Automattic has
an obvious motivation to maintain it and not alienate their paying
Wordpress users, I'm not too worried about it. They never "need"
avatars to identify posters, the pix are tied to the e-mail addresses
that are part of the user's identity.

>On the other hand, avatars do have a privacy advantage over actual
>pictures. They cannot be used to train a face recognition database.

Gravatar allows you to upload whatever you want.  They're lousy for
training because they're quite small.

R's,
John