Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F693A0F43 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kz9tB6uolgKN for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C873A0F33 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F345C0117; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 03:13:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 03:13:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=pWIIh6Wn/yR632RC467LYzAC1g2bpMJY/ccqVZUu3 Qk=; b=M0mJDmL013+dgczL5eprSMdWlvsY/fznKUk7HCcVpVmpyDEkp/C327ypI iseDaS1u4dTR47OeACmwkCgBl5FPWR+LbFgwcNiM4Z18c68Q0Ueva07eS6GjuKSM iR+NLBrOuMpnpUT2Z3PnM0iOnMNfGieaEqueZILUyaJ3ju+NQJ6qq2b+M8JdMj1O YS4ndAdywrQ2ldDe1/sIlHGCO34I6XH1jqco+3wqawo8L/kDkp9YLAi/D4hswiVy QsZx3IFJ6SPzzTIKYvriW8Hlx3JvoyXTKvTfTu2OVT+R1YExT7BvRLydsAQ5OVKM G86laJFAN1kHQaFTTWwjFysyKg6MQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qQopX6Zs5MIV-KGKRD4v4Nj17ow-_OMGLOHbX2H92SmT9mT1sY9imQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeehgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihht hhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephefhuedtheefgfefgffhkeehgfeugfeiudeugeejkeef leelueeiffetfeeuudeunecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrdduheenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qQopX9aC3Zkl3E8o3vvep9P8d0zv4lCNl4_MWbDqKOoHGSH10Q7saA> <xmx:qQopX09Rha-vugWwmLbhBhlf3Dm7sGzll15WoWer1YK6Hdi-n56ppw> <xmx:qQopX8oEiD6W5ERrbcjbF73IpfXwWe2SB-6dvG_0yHR_KsKKHFVYwQ> <xmx:qQopXy7ys2S6iOLG1dhS5sfikYHQFFDge4aaHs99NNpQHcD2MmxKCQ>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CC4A53280064; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 03:13:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, 108attendees@ietf.org
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <3b9cc8e5-a9f2-cc44-8fc5-6b7649e43343@cs.tcd.ie> <392F9FEA-BA4A-4E57-B80D-D5B288B9887A@jisc.ac.uk> <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net> <20200802025924.GH1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3C71AFFA-E6D5-446C-B20A-C35B1EB8FFDF@nostrum.com> <m2eeoog2fr.wl-randy@psg.com> <BY5PR11MB4337767597051839FE069836C14D0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <78c2bda7-ccf5-44f0-9520-f012d6949180@dogfood.fastmail.com> <b7abb72c-c1d5-52c1-c718-7c982e76d788@network-heretics.com> <e702d892-38ac-51fd-1605-a834e6575b0c@cisco.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <cb5fa0fe-8aeb-ae7f-e68f-53c0f0360ff7@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 03:13:43 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e702d892-38ac-51fd-1605-a834e6575b0c@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/T0D1hL1g3jp36OAlLgXZBBSixes>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 07:13:48 -0000

On 8/4/20 3:02 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:

> With 4 meetings/year instead of 3, we know that IETF would move 
> faster. To (try to) be on par with opensource projects speed, we have 
> to adopt monthly or bi-weekly virtual calls. Whether you call that 
> design team (with only active participants) or working group meeting 
> (with everybody), it's a detail.

I'm not a big fan of monthly or bi-weekly calls because that discourages 
cross-area review and increases the potential for groups to work at 
cross-purposes with one another.  Of course, under current pandemic 
circumstances, increased use of virtual interim meetings is better than 
slowing to a standstill.

On the other hand, if we're not going to be traveling physically to 
meetings for a few years, we could perhaps increase frequency of 
IETF-wide meetings as you suggest.

Basically I think these conditions are likely to be with us long enough 
that we'll have to change our habits of working.   Which might be a good 
thing because we've been stuck in these habits for 20+ years.   But 
there are lots of considerations to take into account.

Keith