Re: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool

Christian Hopps <> Fri, 10 July 2020 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744B83A07C5; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 03:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAO_F0lTgwDO; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 03:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9D73A07C6; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 03:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5433060F1F; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christian Hopps <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DDD8B724-45C8-4080-823E-A1D6872AC016"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.\))
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 06:08:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: Christian Hopps <>,,
To: Martin Duke <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:08:50 -0000

Will there be a function that captures a non-anonymous raising of hands (like the email list or the in-person meeting)? Not all WGs use hums.


> On Jul 9, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Martin Duke <> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Martin Duke <>
> Date: Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:59 PM
> Subject: Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
> To: <>
> The IESG and IETF LLC are working with the Meetecho team to add the capability to conduct “virtual hums” in fully remote meetings. A software model model that shows the output for given numbers of people humming is available for experimentation [TEST_SITE].
> Working Group chairs seeking “a sense of the room” are invited to use this tool to help obtain it. As always, consensus ultimately requires confirmation on the email list.
> The current implementation is based on a specification the IESG developed [I-D.duke]. Briefly, the workflow is as follows:
> 	• A chair begins the hum in meetecho
> 	• Participants have 20 seconds to hum loudly, softly, or not all
> 	• At the conclusion of the hum, Meetecho will report the approximate loudness of the hum, on the following increasing scale: niente, pianissimo, piano, forte, fortissimo.
> As there is no IETF consensus that offline hums have specific flaws, the current specification seeks to reproduce the offline version as faithfully as possible. The SHMOO working group [SHMOO] might reach consensus on a different set of requirements in the future, and update or replace this document.
> The community will have an opportunity to try out this tool at participant [PARTICIPANTS] and session chair [CHAIRS] training sessions beginning 15 July. Feedback is welcome on the manycouches mailing list. In particular, practical operational issues (e.g. bug reports, usability concerns, security weaknesses) and strong, unambiguous consensus for feature changes might be actionable prior to IETF 108. More contentious philosophical concerns are best left for long-term consideration by SHMOO.
> Regards,
> Martin Duke
> On behalf of the IESG
> [I-D.duke]