Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 02 August 2020 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A613A0EBC for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 07:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pmIYxOchIdpJ for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 07:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A890E3A0EBD for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 07:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id s23so26486226qtq.12 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 07:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=dQoqK2PORbks+pOirY2+PEbnsf3nUvy8BWx+ONXGhNg=; b=ijB1daZMQXtGpDcoijemI7fuRSsUFmMfeXy+3wUol01Rhxie2t0by99GqTGGP6HRnH nB1htF+4wrhMagddkKBwApOHOS2tUjmezF1smqnfB5Kz83eYfPPiBOn0/JU3EWg1GTaq C3rrWYcUm1KUqj4Ack245AMpg3jpCL2ATl32xrcCzOdIIz54JteS2n8k9Fathr/Hnv3C C8YwydvCU4cOZLRbUPk+QaW7xIEvCsohRWjKYUdxTdG2f2p4S5SyJ9CXrTpYRXXDeU/X y9E504Y+eTYEjcfM5ecH2XoyOc/sXR0B4N4Cak6FwP6BnMm4iA1DHzmBLfR/BWkqn4ld yRWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=dQoqK2PORbks+pOirY2+PEbnsf3nUvy8BWx+ONXGhNg=; b=eImv9UjCALURIerboPzMHPr0uuUhG7BIMw47qJ3nQLPAl639HTBL70FFvQ1lvUBS9A Vi0XjXQJVdsZBerJQcmBT/ohtedPyQMRBIVbFaCJukWzajf/8+aGRj1VpqEJs4p1Elrt XzfmiYpfsVpQPCkh/3s+20/bJX6pbZw0qDncbHjj4We65aSdIrZ1WBPf+jA1YhKuyBgz MSOBQ2IlKIRuStoO6GIU1N5Fq7C3TU82XYk9nBXfGavOu9/Sk6GDjphe+KXpIaAYA4FF 2/txfUv31BYcfqNJeBTRuFw20T9xYUKwyqxEfBCbqBhMyfO4szJ/hjJUL/dWBOJLMA1S aY8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YVuVNqafsiSudg/+3VXf6h6ZPj+p9LUwwTLb/qsyE43FYEnux 7rkrA2IdAPwIMOTTntJmMRDv/+jNUdlUGQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjMupIZoNF7XKFkF5cK3d6MNU0mLZZ7qPc21yZ1C9U6OV6uepQ1Vl+SWduejvLfRyM3qmBbQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4d1e:: with SMTP id w30mr12872042qtv.246.1596379950370; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 07:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2601:18b:300:36ee:b018:9f4d:5df6:5fc8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k11sm15473219qkk.93.2020.08.02.07.52.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Aug 2020 07:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:52:28 -0400
Message-Id: <957C3E78-B21C-4CC9-84D4-B07F3674BE02@fugue.com>
References: <f9f6bb5f-3a9f-e68a-0881-8856abcecf27@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, 108attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <f9f6bb5f-3a9f-e68a-0881-8856abcecf27@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18A339)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/oDGV0Z2ZcAuD4Y-RiN_4oAIVh80>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:52:39 -0000

On Aug 2, 2020, at 10:26, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> I had actually assumed that by "recorded video" we meant what ANRW used.  Which are just video's of the slides, with a moving mouse pointer if the presented chose to use that.  As such, the "video production" problem is reduced to a "how do I record a slide presentation problem.

I think this is right. The point is not to have a pet professionally produced connection, but to get the point Abriss. To me, the opportunity to do additional takes seems like a plus, but if you don’t see it that way, it’s fine to do a single take. That is after all what we currently do. 

My general experience giving presentations in a single take is that I always realize halfway through what I should have said. 

I worked expect that the main objection to this would be simply that it placed the pressure to have a presentation earlier in the timeline, and we all seem to be very good at doing everything at the last minute. But I don’t think that’s a valid objection —it’s just a bias we probably need to overcome.