[108attendees] IETF 108 is unique !

K Mohan Raidu <kmraidu@informaticsindia.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <kmraidu@informaticsindia.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193233A0FF3 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 01:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=informaticsindia-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eqHWY9JHDIIX for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 01:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF453A0FF2 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 01:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id a26so15685498ejc.2 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 01:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=informaticsindia-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RR5WNteB1ijhS2IDcLfpN/Sbz5P6HE527oy2+ZND54Q=; b=ICYh1ORQzbJc4DGkYYAPYdeQCXLRk5DQF4qSzuMg/Gxn568/RNobg07CQ3ZeVEZHSw 2pl3kkUCtM4nlMxSztfYAPJH8BbU2fY+uW+myjiSWsxe1ZJVWqvEu8xIm2jN1Feio/Nl my5WpFkzhB8loOcJu4ScQ3W5GYbbFOtFay3aCJKPkA4cqcW0A/CH5pSbffu8apcmYOUB 7NUvirIvrCza1qncKvotli8e9m90kzLmuG13i1j5/kxoRmJCeJsVkuCquFbD15G7JS5J Hf3EDO1jEkxFFnwAYauuR4lfzGs2NQj1S2b6+cPpEj3CzVgfmmt9+PX9ElknwjP1mHNT BJ0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RR5WNteB1ijhS2IDcLfpN/Sbz5P6HE527oy2+ZND54Q=; b=kAaOI+1F8Fi7wH72e6N/llHhHKDTC1uTe8hLmuM+EpU66jpsyasGTZzTfSNRf2Dh7o FsnA6Xn/hGpnBjVKOuHKu3+7O6d7e5k+emRULeiAvlGk93ItQrNaGVDr1S8q8p4MpAqp Xxc2S8MpY+QULaEUoQMfL+3XFTJWjdyGq2fUo5aVLcYwUumGdG8bjkD7PbfYd9er7Kxj 9zSEstl241y7G3AqZd8QMIGDDxtzAvL+Z5TvE+pP27l5rHsXwziJQSV/UMSlvfsfs45p XXGVIlN8uBSGGIH1iT4/XcxFiSS0CxGM3G3ET9mNs5G7JFa1OTgF6648LKyX+yDM7X6t 7j+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/k7HDfLMbqgHNZ1RkxAx8AJvdNEHzPUg9OCJjAHLFjCD+MGIA IN3P5ff7n+/d/G9JWQd3tCWPEwHHj3AgYoAk0SoJ5g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYIYFqKtAdwOtX8V8xtCMsY1DYs1koharCJwSHtlgP0hkfUoPkUwj8Z8BNuhl7QItuclKDxEyGIEdUgvGGDFA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:da19:: with SMTP id fi25mr19761014ejb.405.1596529908102; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 01:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <3b9cc8e5-a9f2-cc44-8fc5-6b7649e43343@cs.tcd.ie> <392F9FEA-BA4A-4E57-B80D-D5B288B9887A@jisc.ac.uk> <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net> <20200802025924.GH1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3C71AFFA-E6D5-446C-B20A-C35B1EB8FFDF@nostrum.com> <m2eeoog2fr.wl-randy@psg.com> <BY5PR11MB4337767597051839FE069836C14D0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <78c2bda7-ccf5-44f0-9520-f012d6949180@dogfood.fastmail.com> <b7abb72c-c1d5-52c1-c718-7c982e76d788@network-heretics.com> <e702d892-38ac-51fd-1605-a834e6575b0c@cisco.com> <cb5fa0fe-8aeb-ae7f-e68f-53c0f0360ff7@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <cb5fa0fe-8aeb-ae7f-e68f-53c0f0360ff7@network-heretics.com>
From: K Mohan Raidu <kmraidu@informaticsindia.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:01:33 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP_MQExowYUu9GKhoagiVKC-GO9PsiJCDXzot9Y9T83bZvy6pQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, 108attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000bcfa505ac09169f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/pa3TT1JRny_7KOUhDS2e1LXVit4>
Subject: [108attendees] IETF 108 is unique !
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:31:52 -0000

My dear friends,

IETF 108 has been very unique.
1. Session's relevant matters were readily available in one place for every
session.
2. Date wise, time wise and Session wise Agenda was very helpful.
3. Resource persons have handled the Sessions in a friendly style.
4. IETF108 has added tons value to the participants.

Hearty Congratulations to all the players, for making the grand historical
event.

Warm regards to all of you,

K Mohan Raidu
Chairman
ISoc India Hyderabad Chapter (In-formation)




On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:53 PM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> On 8/4/20 3:02 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:
>
> > With 4 meetings/year instead of 3, we know that IETF would move
> > faster. To (try to) be on par with opensource projects speed, we have
> > to adopt monthly or bi-weekly virtual calls. Whether you call that
> > design team (with only active participants) or working group meeting
> > (with everybody), it's a detail.
>
> I'm not a big fan of monthly or bi-weekly calls because that discourages
> cross-area review and increases the potential for groups to work at
> cross-purposes with one another.  Of course, under current pandemic
> circumstances, increased use of virtual interim meetings is better than
> slowing to a standstill.
>
> On the other hand, if we're not going to be traveling physically to
> meetings for a few years, we could perhaps increase frequency of
> IETF-wide meetings as you suggest.
>
> Basically I think these conditions are likely to be with us long enough
> that we'll have to change our habits of working.   Which might be a good
> thing because we've been stuck in these habits for 20+ years.   But
> there are lots of considerations to take into account.
>
> Keith
>
>
> --
> 108attendees mailing list
> 108attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees
>


-- 
With Kind Regards,

K Mohan Raidu
*Director*
ii *Informatics India*
*1-9-1113/1/A/A, Vidyanagar,*
*Hyderabad - 500044.*

*9985033566*

*Click here to Unsubscribe
<kmraidu@informaticsindia.com?subject=Unsubscribe>*