Re: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3254B3A0F03 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q8sdzk_ljbu6 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F823A0F5A for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 184so4296486wmb.0 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=9voVY3JkceqgzF+HBfZiiWxm/xADCqbBP/2ruN5ZIZg=; b=EkDod3c7YVrorvcF+AdmwM1vNnvCbO1JrtexnHzojOYH72WMvVSLd0kRkvVoqANUhr ujmfjHlvO1TlEZmxHVra5w+ZREmJR/CAT0cpyOgNAenSfwlXi98GWt9BFV91Q1H74ixv Xl607pkaJonkgxRx4jFUlcVyapMWntPMWwsiJA4OruPk3WrSaQ8jWwLNiSuu/bPg2rum uQpfLle1C4R4DAr+xBjcPQNX4hcYh2PA4KPgTiGKpFrVdMV4+v7LNQ8yt60aCZWBU0Rb XN97YgobCI5riLjNZjOprgOJBNPx9Tx1jAA3941mWhP6WniEAV1E1AyMAg+sClAriqUJ FxNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=9voVY3JkceqgzF+HBfZiiWxm/xADCqbBP/2ruN5ZIZg=; b=XVz6Tsy5raAkjXSh1wFx6WXtKAMtNTbSF3qwo5TPju2qYGU/nmDehTmdxaC4KNj8yJ GNXGmhgzSUjiX0EM86rJF2Z5cRf7YO2aoXJl0GiRAmx6SemzB72NmNtqqgN8s9TCZWqY 6JlDHi7TcgufbgcBjGuT6PrxRS667ZwSkx4xJ7A5ewH0TVrE0a6vJSFK2qRIEwj5coHz wVx7IdgJA7QzzqsJbtqi1CkUzF9uVXNgGVSyOu/iFJ/KYhwwUQukIzHrLrNW+W3fQ7u4 z+vBMgg4HbpKT1U89EYXsmX9SA14uqKnAwXJi1g8xrwSygNu5FmvejsM5UEcyKEBgP2z sdKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531d5C0dLNrgLBx2nFM6tC3M11D0eJpkHhN8C/3xnCHxSpMfOvR4 3ao/1/4WNG9PMSl7rwr6t9Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztMHkeQKtRd7OYLzZDiLstFx4DonuKhKYUePsEZMkvo+NWl1ZSDlN/DoaLDlwxhB37xkdTXA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:964d:: with SMTP id y74mr10718195wmd.80.1596056072130; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:a1bb:b4b9:7e6:ac64? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:a1bb:b4b9:7e6:ac64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y63sm6109300wmy.27.2020.07.29.13.54.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <616BBD78-2982-4399-9DFC-2DC5D2D67EEB@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EF67D2FC-811D-4D05-94AA-B28EB35420CB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:54:27 -0700
In-Reply-To: <8E587F95-744E-4E6F-A3F9-76B9D02BA5D4@fugue.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 108attendees@ietf.org
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <C992207C-96DF-47B5-8927-C150E4380D94@gmail.com> <DAD7BBEB-4A79-4D0C-8F62-E7BFEB320E0B@fugue.com> <F6E1304C-7ED8-4583-9FF4-DB52E8318332@gmail.com> <8E587F95-744E-4E6F-A3F9-76B9D02BA5D4@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/pvMnD78S3SFq_59RN9xKvlTjRd8>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Introducing the Meetecho Virtual Hum tool
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:54:42 -0000


> On Jul 29, 2020, at 1:10 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 3:24 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Trying to not take a position on is humming a vote, but do want to note that we usually (always?) confirm things like hums in meetings on the mailing list.   The use of email for this a lot like voting because it is sent by identified individuals.
> 
> There’s an important distinction, though: there is no electorate. And I hope you aren’t measuring consensus purely on the basis of the number of replies! :)

No, of course not.   However, we might come to a different conclusion if only a few people respond, rather than many.

I think we need something similar for the virtual hum.

Bob