IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [110attendees] Blue sheet question

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 12 March 2021 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00083A111C for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:48:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4DuGZnUAT_X for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6BF3A111A for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1lKj5Z-0008CL-S3; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:48:29 -0500
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:48:23 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>, 110attendees <110attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <80708EA8EBC52A27919D4832@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <ab2e310a-9134-b733-cbd2-141a7f114d37@labs.htt-consult.com>
References: <ab2e310a-9134-b733-cbd2-141a7f114d37@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/110attendees/EmDVXP6CDITiruOg7U5yWzlQTOM>
Subject: Re: [110attendees] Blue sheet question
X-BeenThere: 110attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 110 attendees <110attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/110attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:110attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:48:37 -0000


--On Friday, March 12, 2021 09:42 -0500 Robert Moskowitz
<rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> wrote:

> How are blue sheets tracked where you jump between meetings?
> 
> Since there is the legal use of blue sheets, I might assume,
> once you are in a session, you are on that one's blue sheet
> forever.  So potentially can get on LOTS of bluesheets.
> 
> Actually this is a break from F2F where you might pop into a
> session, listen for a bit, then leave.

To the last point only...

The real break from f2f is that it is much harder to be in a
meeting -- whether popping in or being there for the duration--
without signing in.  Whether having the choice of signing, or
not signing, the blue sheets is an advantage or a disadvantage
is obviously another question.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email