Re: [110attendees] Meetecho is a resource hog

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 09 March 2021 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415EB3A1530 for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:17:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umYkbyX6kyuI for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40A93A1519 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:17:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from macbook-pro.localdomain (mta-70-120-133-87.satx.rr.com [70.120.133.87] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 129IH94Y050027 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:17:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1615313831; bh=pNnruRnnEqJqQJU9gfhCf97nv0QTe4vWBFc2LTWOGd8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=F8lrQPidZVL5UMIeXBx0+8oEXZq5UNHMyXIttAMy5CZL5fg1fqxQE171GFsCfYYxp NT5rh033EPCZfPIPIPoi6Y5H22zZoDDkxo0Jt8IV6pkwqDuY8E7WNj6ZB5X0p42AFi RrUzZMLI7VZmEZmTa8fT9wnmuEpaJl4+MOMlslZM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mta-70-120-133-87.satx.rr.com [70.120.133.87] (may be forged) claimed to be macbook-pro.localdomain
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <03FCE894-1CAF-4FA7-8F0A-60C738F1E9CD@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_54382165-A816-4FC0-9395-D143A9234330"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:17:04 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1D66FED0-4CDD-467D-8520-C6A4051A5262@juniper.net>
Cc: "110attendees@ietf.org" <110attendees@ietf.org>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <b9069923-7e3b-8546-a3c2-31c168aaacec@labs.htt-consult.com> <27C05D43-CFE7-4528-BB37-4C1A668098FC@gmail.com> <204f33b7-c60c-c7dd-4f0d-e0a546321b2b@labs.htt-consult.com> <587FBDF9-BA4B-432A-8091-EF3A13B5D250@tzi.org> <05aea1ec-8125-84ec-8fa6-57dfca0e3fa2@labs.htt-consult.com> <D7929822-BFDC-483E-AB7E-D1965190A3F8@rfc1035.com> <09eca30a-fcec-84c8-08cd-e85e6db0bf0a@labs.htt-consult.com> <CWXP123MB32533BBB22B7234E876CFCCCE6929@CWXP123MB3253.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <240E1EE1-2A65-4E4A-A30E-B9CC89EE93B9@stewe.org> <74A61915-A37C-4F7B-9ADC-7611D3879DB0@nostrum.com> <1D66FED0-4CDD-467D-8520-C6A4051A5262@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/110attendees/F2hCNoga5i92EdVwR_gxZ3BC3bg>
Subject: Re: [110attendees] Meetecho is a resource hog
X-BeenThere: 110attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 110 attendees <110attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/110attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:110attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 18:17:19 -0000


> On Mar 9, 2021, at 11:36 AM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com <mailto:ben@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On a counter-point: My first-gen airpods are getting _much_ better battery life (on order of 2x) with Meetecho than with other conferencing services. This seems extremely weird to me. I had similar results yesterday using latest production Safari on an M1 macbook pro, and today using latest Chrome on same machine.
> 
> Better silence suppression from Meetecho?

Could be. It was also pointed out to me offline that I usually use the native applications for the other conferencing tools, since they tend to have rather clunky WebRTC clients. So browser vs non-browser may be making a difference. Maybe I should experiment with the other tools’ WebRTC clients again.