Re: [110attendees] Blue sheet question

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 12 March 2021 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253EB3A11B5 for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inGui6m3cCIN for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B5643A11AE for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A6612421481 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:06:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:06:49 +0000
References: <ab2e310a-9134-b733-cbd2-141a7f114d37@labs.htt-consult.com> <B60CEC82-FA26-4299-9677-39192DE4F5FE@stewartbryant.com> <ED03AB86-DDC8-4750-A2AA-DC706407219C@jisc.ac.uk> <B7A5B7C1-DCC0-40DA-AEC4-5BD1C4A5BB69@akamai.com> <0C31AB0C-22F9-4860-9591-7145289EB345@tzi.org> <a63de1c3-45e6-9888-0571-bbb9bd615668@labs.htt-consult.com>
To: 110attendees <110attendees@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <a63de1c3-45e6-9888-0571-bbb9bd615668@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-Id: <BE414D1F-5811-459C-B1EC-124CCFA9CE19@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/110attendees/Oc3A7hfC9kSPfIy4hkWo0AQqqKA>
Subject: Re: [110attendees] Blue sheet question
X-BeenThere: 110attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 110 attendees <110attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/110attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:110attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:07:00 -0000


> On 12 Mar 2021, at 15:03, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> wrote:
> 
> So are we going to use blockchain for e-bluesheets to maintain who is where when?

Nah. Quantum bluesheets. Because..... quantum!

And Rich will get his plausible deniability because of superpositioning.

I think I might be on to something...