IETF Logo Mail Archive

[110attendees] Is Meetecho a resource hog?

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 09 March 2021 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515D33A0A1C for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:06:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AkEeaxofknTM for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC623A0B41 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A7CB2421481; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:06:53 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <b9069923-7e3b-8546-a3c2-31c168aaacec@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:06:51 +0000
Cc: 110attendees <110attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D8D8757C-B4D5-461D-B0C8-5E42CB516973@rfc1035.com>
References: <b9069923-7e3b-8546-a3c2-31c168aaacec@labs.htt-consult.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/110attendees/T43KYf9nm0vEZRfGKfCFB_hubV8>
Subject: [110attendees] Is Meetecho a resource hog?
X-BeenThere: 110attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 110 attendees <110attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/110attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:110attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:06:59 -0000


> On 9 Mar 2021, at 13:02, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> wrote:
> 
> Anyway, Meetecho is a hog for me.

It’s not for me - unlike some of the other webtrc tools you mentioned.

Apples and oranges...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email