Re: [110attendees] Meetecho is a resource hog

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Tue, 09 March 2021 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E053A0BEF for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:44:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5XP3Zq4WL2jf for <110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BD63A0BED for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 129KiKDA046878 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:44:20 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B71D2080D8 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:44:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB8C2080B7 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:44:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.14.1.72] ([10.14.1.72]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 129KiJVG011975 for <110attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:44:19 +0100
To: 110attendees@ietf.org
References: <b9069923-7e3b-8546-a3c2-31c168aaacec@labs.htt-consult.com> <27C05D43-CFE7-4528-BB37-4C1A668098FC@gmail.com> <204f33b7-c60c-c7dd-4f0d-e0a546321b2b@labs.htt-consult.com> <587FBDF9-BA4B-432A-8091-EF3A13B5D250@tzi.org>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <97ca570b-1ddc-4e30-aa24-d97dcd1d4f32@cea.fr>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 21:44:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <587FBDF9-BA4B-432A-8091-EF3A13B5D250@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010808090307000402090701"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/110attendees/plri5f4Mjiy2cGC_yH0DTpitKsE>
Subject: Re: [110attendees] Meetecho is a resource hog
X-BeenThere: 110attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 110 attendees <110attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/110attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:110attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 20:44:24 -0000

Le 09/03/2021 à 16:03, Carsten Bormann a écrit :
> If we really want to be able to run meetecho on e-waste, we have to 
> control those video feeds.

Something could be controled in several ways.

During the meetecho sessions I noticed that the slide presentation runs
at about same bandwidth as the feed video of the person - around
250kbit/s or so.

But the slide image is so fixed whereas the human expression so rich in
movements.  They could use different bandwidths.  If slide bandwidth
were much lower, maybe my computer's ventilators would not turn on.

This is to say to keep the video feed of the person at the expense of
maybe something else.

Alex

> 
> I’m looking at 3*250 kbit/s speaker/chair postage-stamp videos plus
> a 100 kbit/s slide video feed.
> 
> The postage stamps would need to be re-encoded to the size shown and 
> the slides should not be a video in the first place (see my 
> tools-discuss posting).
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>