Re: [111attendees] test
Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Thu, 22 July 2021 19:48 UTC
Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F323A07A4 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KkdXXhVkJ0bJ for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF153A0763 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id q15so6549166qkm.8 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=r4VJE2TVjkjOMHpJexll20OHASO1JefNA50/83w0rrA=; b=bF1J4cLuHMZHipZ8qcHnnsZSX1wtpx1plmdGMF15GqsY5+CtA4+w7xs8vfzuIt6Sct tJDBY+j5I61Mqr/oYwlNONcqgblGq5UpedelvOsKTaRoRf/2cPT5CL/2cNhi8nmHJfm5 W9tX5uZzVfY37jhh33eG7n8mZ4a8mKVRsGZSe+xgxh0PvuUT1YJDI2+XLutGQVo/Cykp v1e5Z+WBnikh/sEzMWFEOK3VmPrweQbdp1wRTlY17I6L8NFwOhHpJwfaZXFQt8TEzQ9e 6nMvSDtFQD5yHW7OeFzMd0oeInAM0S0uOO209arz/cxb6/gWAILDrZ6tr/0sZplxEbf8 5BBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=r4VJE2TVjkjOMHpJexll20OHASO1JefNA50/83w0rrA=; b=S5dJ1MaxlheZP9l8lYx7/WbkJ3R3oZboItgcVuH+nXrZzf5WfBvP6H0XbFDBAb9AYE A4IEKmnpEl+flaIDPB5A2lt7pB6N9e8LzeQ9KN3kIy6PpVbLIMzxOWgsis7IOkCHLUzz ginQmTrb78o9qhlf62LJqXQDG2RudeeM97CECCXcxfMLcwQdUBRN+O/jIW2SGrAAifcP jDTEQrticDmEHZcRbsjdnjoNuPox0nEMwDljWIm2BgaTICEXjASDZwGqCcs3jAbPzIXf rlrHCxrK/2uAmU62ibF0TURBXAnXZR+5OdTeQchoo0/xavLdfdH6i8QanZ+oAUohvUWJ Afog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53006dGpQ+exQlpesGgv0puS/aQRh5IuXM59ZIKKzlhC5kaIWrLo Lnh9WlQAsz9DBxOcAwgbtsdvM2zOPt6SIHmF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJmBxp8NAx2DSUHS6An1UyFzRZU+aongDcfWijr8D9XPesuCqGmnfpJ7LkSO4YTE9oQuv7pw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9f55:: with SMTP id i82mr1298128qke.459.1626983274055; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.23] (pool-108-51-200-187.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.51.200.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm4766564qtp.76.2021.07.22.12.47.53 for <111attendees@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: 111attendees@ietf.org
References: <c211bfe6-0ffb-b4d8-a3b8-840ab9ee0368@gmail.com> <af8652ed-179a-78d5-eb47-02302ba5e5c2@labs.htt-consult.com> <F7AA1B7F-23E8-48FB-B89B-AB2DAF1F1F8A@gmail.com> <CAAm_rSJcKNJchYt2_CEwBFQapQ3bDfbPXrJQkHQnsKW2i193Dw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <ecad2565-6447-2065-53c6-f46d55666888@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:47:52 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAm_rSJcKNJchYt2_CEwBFQapQ3bDfbPXrJQkHQnsKW2i193Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4F4787550FA540A857CB8B47"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/1UR0SEApXFq7t8tnqzk4Zxb67Vg>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] test
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 19:48:06 -0000
I hate to put a damper on things, but I doubt that Madrid will happen - the global vaccination numbers aren't going up fast enough, the infection rate trend line is going in the wrong direction, etc. We'll find out soon enough - Aug 9 I think was the date for the decision. Have either Cisco or Huawei changed their no-travel policies yet? Mike On 7/22/2021 2:12 PM, Nigel Hickson wrote: > Here here to Madrid! > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, 18:11 Carlos M. Martinez, <carlosm3011@gmail.com > <mailto:carlosm3011@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Robert is right here… we so far have been running on “social > interaction credit” we accumulated over many meetings and many > years… how long will that last is a big question mark. > > I definitely hope we can make it to Madrid in some form. > > /Carlos > > On 22 Jul 2021, at 14:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 7/22/21 4:52 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > >> > >> test > >> > >> It is strange there is no activity on the 111attendees email > list at > >> IETF, just a few days before the online meeting starts. > >> > > > > Not so strange. May F2F weeks had no traffic until the weekend > > prior. > > > > We have lost the social interaction. And what little we have we > tend > > to do poorly. I really hope we do make it to Madrid. > > > > Bob > > > > -- > > 111attendees mailing list > > 111attendees@ietf.org <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees> > > -- > 111attendees mailing list > 111attendees@ietf.org <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees> > >
- [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [111attendees] test ANURAG VIJAY AGRAWAL
- Re: [111attendees] test Jared Mauch
- Re: [111attendees] test ANURAG VIJAY AGRAWAL
- Re: [111attendees] test Ujjwal Sharma
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Henk Birkholz
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [111attendees] test Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] building up interaction credit… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test Nigel Hickson
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [111attendees] test Michael StJohns
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Warren Kumari
- Re: [111attendees] test Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [111attendees] test Julia Urbina-Pineda
- Re: [111attendees] test Nigel Hickson
- Re: [111attendees] test Randy Bush
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test MORTON JR., AL
- Re: [111attendees] test John C Klensin
- Re: [111attendees] test Sanjeev Gupta
- Re: [111attendees] test Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [111attendees] test Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test Randy Bush
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Nigel Hickson
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Lars Eggert
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Paul Muchene
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Paul Muchene
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Ted Lemon
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Henk Birkholz
- Re: [111attendees] test Andrew Campling
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [111attendees] test Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [111attendees] test Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [111attendees] test David Brown
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- [111attendees] Please change the Subject line [wa… Bob Hinden
- Re: [111attendees] test Diego Dujovne
- Re: [111attendees] Please change the Subject line… Jim Reid
- Re: [111attendees] Please change the Subject line… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Ted Lemon
- Re: [111attendees] multisite remote hybrid meetin… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] The joyful benefits of (hybrid… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [111attendees] multisite remote hybrid meetin… Diego Dujovne
- Re: [111attendees] test of 111attendees list and … Oscar Garcia
- [111attendees] future hybrid meeting discuss (was… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test John C Klensin
- Re: [111attendees] multisite remote hybrid meetin… Diego Dujovne
- Re: [111attendees] Planning for hybrid meetings (… Jay Daley
- Re: [111attendees] test Stewart Bryant
- Re: [111attendees] test Stewart Bryant
- Re: [111attendees] test Chukwuka Odele
- Re: [111attendees] test Brian E Carpenter
- [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) Lars Eggert
- Re: [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) John C Klensin
- Re: [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) Lars Eggert
- Re: [111attendees] test Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) Jay Daley