IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [111attendees] timing

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 28 July 2021 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C34A3A2163 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q7OZVWA-JkMw for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95EE53A2162 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13CE54804E; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:25:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id A8ED34E7B92; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:25:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:25:35 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: 111attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210728212535.GP57091@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <20210728211403.C21B7254289F@ary.qy> <AA76737E-C2D4-4C00-8347-33D15611E1D2@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AA76737E-C2D4-4C00-8347-33D15611E1D2@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/N_g2zCaKh5x-j49S6I__AwqSS2I>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] timing
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:25:48 -0000

Does Webex by now allow you to enter UTC ?

I don't think it does explicitly, and if it stil doesn't that is still a
very annoying issue for recurring meetings. 

For example for our weekly NomCom meetings i can already see
how folks will be confused when DST ends differently in
different parts of the planet and you have to figure out which
the original TZ was in which the recurring meeting was done
during those weeks.

Cheers
    Toerless


On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:19:00PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> > 
> >> Using UTC is a big source of errors: ...
> > 
> > I have to completely disagree.
> 
> +1
> 
> NOT using UTC is a big source of errors. (FTFY)
> 
> But this is totally unrelated to the issue at hand.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> -- 
> 111attendees mailing list
> 111attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status