Re: [111attendees] test

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Fri, 23 July 2021 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731C83A1CC8 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 06:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79tAC4YS0DUO for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 06:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73FDC3A1CC6 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 06:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0817624FD for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:36:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yAyuGZAMIX4E for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F220624C7 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: 111attendees@ietf.org
References: <c211bfe6-0ffb-b4d8-a3b8-840ab9ee0368@gmail.com> <af8652ed-179a-78d5-eb47-02302ba5e5c2@labs.htt-consult.com> <F7AA1B7F-23E8-48FB-B89B-AB2DAF1F1F8A@gmail.com> <CAAm_rSJcKNJchYt2_CEwBFQapQ3bDfbPXrJQkHQnsKW2i193Dw@mail.gmail.com> <ecad2565-6447-2065-53c6-f46d55666888@nthpermutation.com> <m2wnphq4ko.wl-randy@psg.com> <758515384.164289.1627031655741@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <0043DCA8-C794-4146-AC2A-F1600ACA2D98@tzi.org> <20210723132655.GI57276@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <914b8bfd-064f-974a-f997-bfda1a70cdad@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:35:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210723132655.GI57276@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9AF7DB32B9B3E6189DD8352F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/TXRju_XpwtDCPZcFLwvK4Zy0hiI>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] test
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:36:15 -0000

The single line mike could be upgraded with a cam, just like at the 
presentation point.  this adds cost over, you can't speak in the room 
unless you do it from your notebook/tablet/phone (chaos!)...

Then the queue management is the mike(s) and online hands-raised.

Or some such.

On 7/23/21 9:26 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> I don't think this particular challenge (mixed online/in-person)
> has really been getting enough attention.
>
> I for once think that it will only work well if the in-person
> meeting part would require attendees even when being together
> in a room to use their notebooks for discussions instead
> of having a physical line at a single microphone, so that
> there is more fairness between local and remote, but that
> was never really discussed on manycouches or
> picked up their documents. Yet i did hear it repeatedly
> as a suggestion from other IEF'er that had to atend
> remotely even before covid.
>
> Cheers
>      Toerless
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:23:42AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On 2021-07-23, at 11:14, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> I'd rather settle for "let the people who can and want meet in person, as long as there are enough of them to make a meeting viable”.
>> … and that, of course, means that this localized gathering is then jointly joining the global online meeting, and not the other way around.
>> The tail/dog thing.
>> Once that really works, we can more aggressively fall back to multiple regional hubs, until global traveling gets easier again.
>>
>> Grüße, Carsten
>>
>> -- 
>> 111attendees mailing list
>> 111attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees

-- 
Standard Robert Moskowitz
Owner
HTT Consulting
C:248-219-2059
F:248-968-2824
E:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com

There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who 
gets the credit