Re: [111attendees] [Tools-discuss] Positive observations and proposals for improvements to Meetecho (was: Re: Re: So, what are jabber scribes actually doing, these days?)

gang Antgam <antgamgang@gmail.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <antgamgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AEC3A1F91; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ip8WBTDi_QWR; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA853A1F86; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id oz16so33271774ejc.7; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LyKQq+SeBaZANx6RL3BXq78lqxBQynn+dQNBRGv588Y=; b=f+nRqk9UkcYMw6vAw3EGHy+Gg+j5ZZCMU116UJEQJLhgpv8PNrpl5CbdmtH8J5SJPi qzYee/Jvn0yVsi+PiWRhojewiAB8lLlsRra7OM0jLD80j1X/DaDE1sxWAykUlaI/F8ka 5Kd8Z9QGDUFGxKOzoZdEjMZhUyHTnyc4qRaPex238bIcP0J9nW2sb+cYhCy0UsO4+T8P xTmvzV4MhAmS8kRJXDouO9mdksvJzNNlY5Kd4YD5InwOI1G09FGCCj8C+4URoSTaEfS9 UyWeuxFk/S7TMtIlHtVCbZQGEcYNtr6EVl0kuUTgogL2ATky9wG3kdx2ltvQ75ZjM1cc SJLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LyKQq+SeBaZANx6RL3BXq78lqxBQynn+dQNBRGv588Y=; b=f/0ADhrpTA6fflufXf7mWMTmFrVDVHOCtdib1Q76sUnINFJ5W7cEJ2Ke8x22m2qQM7 UxpVbCSTgBL0WTfqRTLmJQJ/ocjsqwclqU6JUi64QE5RszIawSS7yavJhlB243uB4aTi HvWcw69tcrABSgV2+d1/7QdeW4/3vs/nxbEz49hEg+tcd4UaRGSTR3tf8qf0aYj0s2TL TC/s50ry4/gLJ+wj0o38f96jbVCtIx9bL+fG/WmHCE586k+Ewg3YgT6Z49snbXbl8xya aq4otndVx+D5fJHIozVo05OwTawst9yXy+Fffpz9i9IUC4uBYCM5x4S4FjML2RAii51z +xgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JMPOIN+Z1Ub3VQBIUMZ28IHSliIWld+HtGw/iQNwB1uQPKIX/ vtLiM6aBRDsRfLZAkzVyvNHhNKD1GnKNw5MKZnc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwRWx0Rt0Kkd6jJwrDHnRodyrsERwI0gN1Zhh97ANteI3glpXgWTHq2pIj9J/lKnN4cyMQI0Bz1/98/FFrwzI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c251:: with SMTP id bl17mr17644309ejb.219.1627943112248; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKKJt-dyUbOgM=cAmeALJoUpX9PVUzH+__VjESyT+VF8dzREnw@mail.gmail.com> <4268651f-6bd7-10ce-6ed8-a758bd956062@meetecho.com> <99ae28be-dd15-4018-bccc-a1f61ce19e47@dogfood.fastmail.com> <27783.1627850234@localhost> <CAJq5cE3He3n-2920KkfKqRd0VShSFQRC9w0vLyrfL=-DsosChQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE3He3n-2920KkfKqRd0VShSFQRC9w0vLyrfL=-DsosChQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: gang Antgam <antgamgang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 02:55:00 +0430
Message-ID: <CA+d13g1UTsrcPD0RnRODwkk4Yds3EZVEwfwV3O1sENBq2Ku0WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, 111attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb904b05c89b0a7d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/ZdQp1a6jbZnv7gvAwGAPDiJgChk>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] [Tools-discuss] Positive observations and proposals for improvements to Meetecho (was: Re: Re: So, what are jabber scribes actually doing, these days?)
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:25:34 -0000

در تاریخ دوشنبه ۲ اوت ۲۰۲۱،‏ ۱۵:۴۰ Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
نوشت:

> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 23:37, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >     > *information about who is speaking in the same place as video
> feeds*
> >
> > The video image does do the yellow square when they are speaking.
> >
> >     > See my previous email :)  Basically the "participant list" should
> just
> >     > be an ordered list of participants and only needs to be switched to
> >     > when seeing who is in the call or opening an individual message to
> them
> >     > (and people don't get moved out of order when they're sending
> >     > something).  The "who is sending something" list should be all
> together
> >     > with the video, and chairs pinned even if they're sending nothing
> right
> >     > now.
> >
> > I think that I need a picture.
>
> So, currently we have the Chairs and any "active" participants (hand
> up, mic and/or camera open, presenting slides or screen) moving
> dynamically to the top of the Participants list on the left.  This
> makes it easy to find the Chairs, but if looking for a particular
> person in the list, you have to check both the top of the list and
> their alphabetical position, since their dynamic status could place
> them either way.  By default the Participants list is also hidden when
> you're reading the chat, and vice versa.  And currently the list of
> video thumbnails on the right is *strictly* those people with a camera
> open, whether or not they have the mic open or are active in some
> other way.
>
> The proposal here is to include *anyone* who would normally be moved
> to the top of the Participants list in the list of video thumbnails,
> and make the Participants list mostly static (only Chairs at the top).
> The thumbnail for people without a camera on would be the profile pic
> if they have one, supplemented by the appropriate participation icons
> (hand, microphone, screen, slides).  This gives a natural place to
> show speaking cues, so you can see at a glance who is actually
> speaking.
>
> > As my meetecho windows are more vertical than horizontal, I'd also like
> to be
> > able to move the video boxes to be under the slides.
>
> This also seems like a valid optimisation of screen real estate.  The
> thumbnail list should lie along the edge of the window that is least
> pressured by the presentation area.
>
>  - Jonathan Morton
>
> --
> 111attendees mailing list
> 111attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees
>