Re: [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?

gang Antgam <antgamgang@gmail.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <antgamgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20453A1F36; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ZBw3c8SahO9; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89ACA3A1F6E; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id gs8so33239871ejc.13; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LUpxGsGyrmqHnqY2ehUtEF5YTIhHAYd0RQ6Yrdf470g=; b=UIb5PmA4QKK7vkjLxxSFBaxPtku+p2Nb3RGDGLkEBUzyaY3AqDmGagFXQmBqCm5JXO kddyk1jFilZJ4/wWS8/FJEJqZcgHAr11Dv6iMlRs7pi+7iqroPwHBUHNdDwApjjgsy5K 7LLW2KKgM7O4JRlU7gvl2XXsAvosfy47P9Tyub+hLE0+KZFTkoPi3Y9n2WvOVbo+hfWQ rF2epYmgdG22e11oYZkq0Rzcb6jCgK7a5t57mzMRrt5MYSfCicmU6mvtuv0q/Qn0QjEz hgPCGsOh27Qs3LHi/vgob0gIBMAVjZvVrh4F0kiwzMblBl9eghbNiYpoN2UVkwlDgCae 4p2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LUpxGsGyrmqHnqY2ehUtEF5YTIhHAYd0RQ6Yrdf470g=; b=O/kpSyVVNjF2N9tT8kmifqxU5DbH9LcNyNCFw3XnCq/IJPKrBzBu4LyEQFj1wvHYv8 1ItGlmyejUn/KXvVWIdjQrzLhyJO/+NDooOcXQWx+i1MzqIaAiMdKShXN8UM1QMFDQwJ TSCIVDQAzTF7EOKSGanDoV3xHBgaqjliF7Y2NDQG8pYTBdowXlmtwE+pzU84DasnArS9 gk2huM5PhnXV4BURB2syTVwGtBwbPeyuwXe1dZ829RPAAYILBRWbK/3XSdXrE2q/jqLc LN3a3F//IC49T5UlQ+IG4IW98LPRFlr0bhoZ0/rX0hueyHuQW5J4HnHl1OJ/Y2gOwUIa hIlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KcTjHlIyWGT6fA4EtKfCW5Xu2nLT4dA2lXxIi1tbauf+lUQ9A e/FVASLlfRJslRfaV+v5Ku3cdPAuPejw1a8Ao/LBK5nUUDdmEA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxF9QyoWB7RoFyovQAkkW8LRd5MoS/BnyqWRbzSuk0slumFOsMvcJPXE/6CzqXIoADVMfb/kNqtpVCzJMIcXb4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:190c:: with SMTP id a12mr17880912eje.141.1627943154958; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <daaf0898-fcaf-341b-a710-9c459edebdc1@cs.tcd.ie> <20210801205621.427F0257240C@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20210801205621.427F0257240C@ary.qy>
From: gang Antgam <antgamgang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:55:43 +0430
Message-ID: <CA+d13g2O7ePRW_6UAXP73W_zXAcfVT8PGtgNVP+V+Nd73yCSSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, 111attendees@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000077434605c89b0da1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/sX6SoWdsuDF7QxodB5dIbJi_014>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:26:20 -0000

در تاریخ دوشنبه ۲ اوت ۲۰۲۱،‏ ۱:۲۶ John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> نوشت:

> It appears that Stephen Farrell  <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> said:
> >
> >On 01/08/2021 16:47, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> >> OK, so the summary of the 111attendees discussion is that we don’t
> >> want unauthenticated write access to meeting notes.
>
> >Really? Seems to me the risk isn't significant enough to make
> >someone do work and there's plenty of opportunity to read the
> >draft meeting notes. I don't really object to requiring note
> >takers be authenticated but it doesn't seem that worthwhile.
>
> If they're in the meetecho session, they're already authenticated, so I'm
> having
> a little trouble coming up with a scenario in which someone who isn't
> there needs
> to change he minutes.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> --
> 111attendees mailing list
> 111attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees
>