Re: [111attendees] So, what are jabber scribes actually doing, these days?

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Thu, 29 July 2021 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980233A0C04 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JHMbLgiqaiB; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB0143A0BFF; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <4A447B35-0A01-47CE-AF65-E0C609758409@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_52ED1112-CB76-44C8-86A8-2C52A867623F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:37:40 +1200
In-Reply-To: <B28F923A967AB4792FD2FA6D@PSB>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, 111attendees@ietf.org, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <CAKKJt-ex+bzDO5t4Uznd2aPHf8xP8ZX-JZx5VUSd-7hADsWTGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-c6CyQxpfW+2wVg+NbomwtBPUXZGjL-W8iuQfmaunQmcw@mail.gmail.c om> <20210727204916.GA15189@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <30AFBC23-155E-4BE1-A33C-908FD17BC73C@sn3rd.com> <CAKKJt-d5vbdDNc3BFKLJu7t51Jf30GLQi3-YV3pfZODCOFBO9g@mail.gmail.com> <5A346DF0A2B69EB397207C72@PSB> <7898431E-8B87-44CE-A68D-DC093908495F@ietf.org> <6E6F2343-5DC7-43FE-991A-371E73FC66CA@tzi.org> <12ACD64D-4720-4C25-8080-ECC8ABD19FDE@ietf.org> <B28F923A967AB4792FD2FA6D@PSB>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/y45yBs-og2j1WPiRpe00igDiEFY>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] So, what are jabber scribes actually doing, these days?
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 22:37:49 -0000


> On 30/07/2021, at 10:21 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> --On Friday, July 30, 2021 07:43 +1200 Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 30/07/2021, at 7:32 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 29. Jul 2021, at 21:21, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org
>>> <mailto:jay@ietf.org>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> You can detach the chat window so that it is always visible.
>>> 
>>> No, I can't.  The detached window is a separate browser
>>> window.  When I move that to some of the blank space on the
>>> main window (there is plenty of that), it vanishes behind
>>> that main window each time I interact with it.  So I
>>> essentially have to press the same number of buttons as
>>> before.
>> 
>> Umm … have you tried having the two windows side by side?
> 
> Jay,
> 
> I tried to explain this earlier and I don't know anything about
> Chasten's situation and setup, but "put two windows side by
> side" can imply, for at least some people "make the Meetecho one
> small enough to make it unreadable".   The present setup in
> RFCEFDP is a perfect example.  I also just noticed that, if the
> MEETECHO window is shrunk significantly from the sides, that
> central area with the slides / editing window disappears.
> 
> This is related, too, to your "don't need to scroll" program.
> True if one is using Meetecho in more or less standard layout.
> But, if one needs to fuss with the window size or position in
> order to see and there are three or four people in queue, I get
> myself, the queue, the chairs, and maybe one participant before
> I need to start scrolling.    Or I can scroll down and set the
> framing to see a few participants (including a speaker or two
> who are having active discussion (like you and Peter as I'm
> writing this) but then the queue is invisible unless I scroll
> back up.
> 
> Perfectly reasonable for you to conclude that these are my
> personal and private issues (although I don't think that would
> be correct) and that there is no need for you, Meetecho, or the
> community to be concerned, but then we might need to have a
> conversation about diversity and reasonable accommodations.

I didn’t say that, nor could anything I said be in any way misinterpreted as saying that.  

Yes accessibility concerns are very important to everyone responsible for our systems including the LLC, Meetecho and the Tools Team.  However, as there is a limit to how many interface elements can be simultaneously displayed on a single screen at a chosen text size, the only guaranteed solution is increased screen real estate.

Jay

> 
> best,
>   john
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 111attendees mailing list
> 111attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org