Re: [111attendees] Positive observations and proposals for improvements to Meetecho (was: Re: Re: So, what are jabber scribes actually doing, these days?)

Meetecho IETF support <ietf@meetecho.com> Fri, 30 July 2021 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@meetecho.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CD03A0CB4 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aruba.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMs3D3FppZ9u for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpcmd10101.aruba.it (smtpcmd10101.aruba.it [62.149.156.101]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281093A0C92 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.234] ([2.232.93.8]) by Aruba Outgoing Smtp with ESMTPSA id 9YKzmoKu2nyXH9YKzmsb9d; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 21:38:29 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aruba.it; s=a1; t=1627673909; bh=r3gtCuvRfEx11zm5IEXCGPorVX02oe6fKOzRm+tQYPw=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fYG5vtfEJUcP8merM/s0fgcUK6HfzAeUOuJaotOPWlNiHwW67srDNocgoPOrD+2gU LDZP092UYuJwJjwSnLLllwOIf45nlohRpktaxDebYas6M3C4HlLoyV41iUh046ciYU MqD0h0VpibxiZLd7UoxXaeQKJd1CoA5CTB3OJAmDKE1VqSPdCjGm049HYsp1kCxN6j 8sDgg5lQzSQcab0RAo+E2F4hBZJNfeHRNfrAgyQl4YIioXXqBGZQqjgrPrJJ9deh8s nihzsEy1eBgwqcTAnp6RmH1N2F4Tu/GTv5NmFbcaUOElfD2eehDV6w2jrXvbfEXaVm N4k4d4dEC86lA==
To: 111attendees@ietf.org
References: <CAKKJt-dyUbOgM=cAmeALJoUpX9PVUzH+__VjESyT+VF8dzREnw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Reply-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: Meetecho IETF support <ietf@meetecho.com>
Message-ID: <4268651f-6bd7-10ce-6ed8-a758bd956062@meetecho.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 21:38:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dyUbOgM=cAmeALJoUpX9PVUzH+__VjESyT+VF8dzREnw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEBf1i1kcjY24kCLLBN+YDgvahFGZD5MBToTqVFqKSx3JreZKInS5aeNalTVvIijMmn1+xBwTsW4ZWRvl+iSecmDxbdbvWPEKAhdFMbsk0/ODKEl6vUz 8s6cBRl1xAJ4MTmP7if2bGTkXY0L7gGawXma9TlovKKKuXdOL+8AsAJxxnmV2bQIey/S6LSDpos/9cTQ9Hs2ePHfaTbAFPUcyFg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/zlScIdXnHVFYGiCO0shUcxviSOs>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] Positive observations and proposals for improvements to Meetecho (was: Re: Re: So, what are jabber scribes actually doing, these days?)
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:38:52 -0000

All,

chiming in just to say that we at Meetecho appreciate and value your 
feedback. We'll definitely take it into account when developing the 
future releases of the platform. We'll provide comments on the points 
raised as soon as we get the chance to parse them, i.e., when the 
meeting is over.

Also, I'm cc'ing tools-discuss@ietf.org and setting the reply-to header 
to that list as well, as that's the right place to discuss enhancements 
and provide feedback that would be easier for us to collect.

Best,
Alessandro

Il 30/07/21 19:37, Spencer Dawkins at IETF ha scritto:
> I should have changed the Subject a LONG time ago! But this thread has 
> morphed into helpful observations and suggestions, so, if I might add a 
> couple of things ...
> 
> I agree that Meetecho has been improving (and just for fun, the Meetecho 
> guys were participants in the MEDIACTL session I was co-chairing in 
> Hiroshima at IETF 76 in November 2009, and they roped in a team member 
> from Italy during the discussion using whatever the toolset was back 
> then, so many of you have no idea how MUCH they've improved 😀).
> 
> I see that we've already mentioned detaching the chat window, and 
> usually I remember that we can detach the chat by Tuesday of each IETF 
> meeting week at the latest, which is almost certainly a result of not 
> having THAT much experience with Meetecho during the four months between 
> meetings. Now that we can use Meetecho for interim meetings, that will 
> help me remember more clearly, so good there, too.
> 
> The one thing I've noticed this week is how difficult it is to figure 
> out who is speaking if they aren't sending video, and there's a long 
> list of people in the queue. The suggestion to move the speakers above 
> the queue would improve that, and so would simply displaying the active 
> speaker names in the screen space where their video would have gone, if 
> the person had been sending video.One reason that matters, is that it's 
> helpful for everyone to get the speaker's name right in the minutes. 
> That's not just for new attendees, I'm starting to forget what people 
> sound like, unless I'm talking to them regularly, or they have a very 
> distinctive speech pattern, so I've definitely depending on seeing names 
> when I'm taking minutes. .
> 
> The one thing I was thinking about, as I read through this thread, was 
> that we are kinda *not *talking about what the IETF thinks the target 
> audience for our conferencing tool is.
> 
>   * For probably the last couple of IETFs, I have a GREAT setup for
>     remote participation (my laptop screen, plus two 25-inch monitors).
>     But I do have tiled windows on all three screens.
>   * If we think people who can't throw a few hundred dollars at monitor
>     screens are part of our target audience, that's worth noting.
>   * If we think we're going to have hybrid meetings, in at least some
>     scenarios, it's going to be good to use Meetecho in the conference
>     rooms (especially if we need to be distancing, so more spread out,
>     front to back in the conference rooms).
>   * Even if we aren't doing hybrid meetings, I've participated in some
>     working group meetings from my hotel room, but I wasn't tryng to
>     co-chair a meeting, or even to present at a meeting.
>   * When Michael Richardson and I talked to the Cellar working group
>     participants about switching to Meetecho for our (monthy) interims,
>     the first question we got was, "is there an iOS/Adroid client?" I
>     haven't checked Meetecho on my phone in years, but I'd bet offhand
>     that (1) it would work, but (2) it might not be as easy to use as
>     some other conferencing systems, on those devices. Do people have
>     experience with that?
> 
> I'll let you folks continue to share these positive observations and 
> proposals. Make Good Choices, of course.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Spencer
> 
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:15 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org 
> <mailto:jay@ietf.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Thanks Bron.  Personally I think that’s a great usability adjustment
>     and will forward to the Meetecho team for them to consider.
> 
>     Jay
> 
>      > On 30/07/2021, at 10:58 AM, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com
>     <mailto:brong@fastmailteam.com>> wrote:
>      >
>      > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, at 05:21, Jay Daley wrote:
>      >> No we have absolutely not pushed Meetecho into being "just a
>     contractor", they are a valued partner and we work very well
>     together.  If you have any doubts about that then ask them directly.
>      >>
>      >> It is disappointing that you have escalated a personal concern
>     that you have with our services into such a strong criticism when
>     that is entirely unsupported by any evidence.
>      >
>      > Jay, I agree with your sentiment here - this attitude to Meetecho
>     is counterproductive.  They've done great work for the last couple
>     of IETFs and the experience is improving each time.  I have
>     particularly appreciated the embedded slide management, and I'm sure
>     that will be even better next time too.
>      >
>      > Regarding the specific interface issues that remain, I do think
>     there's a question of "where do we propose improvements in a way
>     that will be noticed"?  I've seen the suggestion made very many
>     times that the "speaker" area (where the video shows) should have
>     additional lines for each person sending anything, rather than that
>     information being at the top of the participant list.  This is much
>     more like the experience with other chat systems, for example Zoom
>     shows either a photo or a blank item for somebody who isn't
>     currently sending video, but they're otherwise treated "the same" as
>     a person sending video in terms of real-estate and where to look for
>     their presence by default.
>      >
>      > Right now with meetecho, my eyes are normally at the video are
>     when people are speaking, but if a non-video person is speaking I
>     need to look across to the other side of the screen to see the audio
>     indication.
>      >
>      > And as was also suggested in this thread, you can't scroll the
>     participant list to find someone to chat to, because they jump to
>     the top when they are sending, then back to alphabetical position. 
>     This is also a usability pain.  Separating "the list of
>     participants" (which wouldn't move about) and "the list of people
>     sending something" with the video and audio indications being
>     together in one place would be a significant improvement.  And as an
>     additional benefit, when you're looking at the chat window, you
>     would still be able to see all the details of who is sending
>     (including yourself - if you're sending then the indicator of your
>     own audio should be the same as the indicator of everyone else's
>     audio, rather than being in yet a third location up under your own
>     name).
>      >
>      > <image.png>
>      > So those two names would appear in the right hand side, and also
>     still have their name in the participant list, and the video feeds
>     would each have a "here's what's being sent".  Chairs would always
>     have a presence on the right, with whatever they were currently
>     sending - and the "participants" tab would only have the list of
>     participants, and not be a place you needed to go to see activity,
>     so you could mostly keep the chat tab open.
>      >
>      > Bron.
>      >
>      >
>      > --
>      >   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>      > brong@fastmailteam.com <mailto:brong@fastmailteam.com>
>      >
>      >
>      > --
>      > 111attendees mailing list
>      > 111attendees@ietf.org <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
>      > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>
> 
>     -- 
>     Jay Daley
>     IETF Executive Director
>     jay@ietf.org <mailto:jay@ietf.org>
> 
>     -- 
>     111attendees mailing list
>     111attendees@ietf.org <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>
> 
>