[112all] Reminder: IETF 112 plenary *today* at 13:30-15:00 UTC
IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> Wed, 03 November 2021 13:15 UTC
Return-Path: <chair@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 112all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF19D3A13A5; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 06:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BuC0Ol1UUfJZ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B57D23A1247; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 06:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7FE4AF65-0845-43EE-B29E-9F2286932C6F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 15:15:30 +0200
References: <CC6AC27D-1DF6-4247-9FAB-235437302FDF@ietf.org>
Cc: 112all@ietf.org, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, irtf-announce@ietf.org
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <B2D671C7-822A-452D-A50C-996BCAC0B107@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112all/Hy5UxtN1h6ap78jbC_Ei7FPlUAw>
Subject: [112all] Reminder: IETF 112 plenary *today* at 13:30-15:00 UTC
X-BeenThere: 112all@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Official communication about IETF 112 <112all.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112all>, <mailto:112all-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112all/>
List-Post: <mailto:112all@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112all-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112all>, <mailto:112all-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:15:40 -0000
Hi, as a reminder, the IETF 112 plenary is scheduled as en experiment *today* at 13:30-15:00 UTC, i.e., in about 15 minutes. The Meetecho link is https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf112/?group=ietf&short=plenary&item=1 <https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf112/?group=ietf&short=plenary&item=1>. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/> the full IETF 112 agenda. Lars Eggert IETF Chair Begin forwarded message: > > From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> > Subject: Experiment: Holding the IETF 112 plenary on Nov 3, 2021 > Date: September 24, 2021 at 10:11:57 GMT+3 > To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, 112all@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org> > Reply-To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> > > Hi, > > based on the feedback received on the proposal to move the IETF 112 > plenary to the week before the meeting [1], the IESG has decided to go > ahead with the experiment. We did receive some feedback indicating > that the proposed experiment is problematic in certain ways for some > individuals, but feel that actually running the experiment is still > appropriate, in order to get data about how it affects the overall > community. > > The IETF 112 plenary will hence already be scheduled on Wednesday, 3 > November 2021, in the time slot of 13:30-15:00 UTC, or 14:30-16:00 > Madrid time. At notable extremes, this begins at 06:30 in San Francisco > and ends at 02:00 in Sydney, with some of the less popular hours over > the Pacific. > > The IESG will evaluate the success of this experiment based on the > following criteria after its conclusion, in consultation with the > community: > > * An improvement in survey responses reporting session conflicts > compared to previous IETF online meetings > > * Positive response to a new survey question about subjective > satisfaction with the format change > > * Elimination of a ninth track, and a reduction in formal conflicts in > the final agenda compared to previous online meetings > > * Little or no reduction in plenary attendance (< 15%) compared to other > online plenaries in European time zones (i.e., IETFs 108 and 110) > > * The subjective experience of the IESG and Secretariat in attempting to > minimize conflicts during IETF 112 > > Not all of these metrics must show improvement for the experiment to be > considered a success, neither does a regression in any of necessarily > indicate failure. The relative weights of these considerations are a > subject for IESG the follow-up discussion and community consultation. > > Lars Eggert > IETF Chair (on behalf of the IESG) > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/z3FZnHmcuxDevC4BkmoY8I89yPk/