Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Wed, 10 November 2021 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030DA3A1050 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:30:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVOI1_qRwSqc for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD873A1049 for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2602:fe55:64:0:b897:f102:7487:45ec]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18ABA54027A; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:28:55 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <665fd538-0629-53bb-4951-87a74b1d6525@cea.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:28:53 -0500
Cc: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>, 112attendees@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41FE1132-CB04-4509-A679-527609F6FAB2@puck.nether.net>
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <9360c78d-04a2-bb8e-5431-92f8dcd12274@labs.htt-consult.com> <0d62c15a-cc34-161e-53d3-c30314094bed@cea.fr> <5DC79F14-6C21-44B8-9C24-1F62A3AC4685@ericsson.com> <14eb9214-3e2c-b4c4-c9a0-83388c50570f@cea.fr> <c7f8aab3-2366-7f56-f7dd-258943f9b2b5@isc.org> <665fd538-0629-53bb-4951-87a74b1d6525@cea.fr>
To: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/KwccrozOIV3fSUiPFh6JmW3fbak>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:30:09 -0000


> On Nov 10, 2021, at 9:18 AM, Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> wrote:
> 
> If Plenary does not mean 'all', then maybe there should be another name
> for it, like 'Halfary'? (half full).  'Partially’?


Despite my (personal hat on) displeasure with how the experiment went, I think it’s good to learn from the experience with what I hope will be the last fully remote meeting for some time.

I expect there to be some lessons learned, and this thread should help inform the consensus of if it was a success or failure vs anyones individual opinion.

- Jared