IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Tue, 09 November 2021 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E1B3A1086 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:15:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTgX5RU0TC96 for <112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0069C3A107E for <112attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:15:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A9KF6sx011250; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 21:15:06 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 18677207ACF; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 21:15:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AEA207616; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 21:15:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.14.0.94] ([10.14.0.94]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 1A9KF5kT017297; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 21:15:05 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2uL05Pj525fcepvLeuT503XZ"
Message-ID: <e688b8fd-8567-bc55-714c-83229b1d383c@cea.fr>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 21:15:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: fr
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com>, "112attendees@ietf.org" <112attendees@ietf.org>
References: <d1fc4b13-89a7-3096-7b9a-6d62997a9b68@cea.fr> <29389D4E-053E-4008-B236-F130A57C14A3@ericsson.com>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
In-Reply-To: <29389D4E-053E-4008-B236-F130A57C14A3@ericsson.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/mgGtF_I8pNk_SyWMCVPiMPmsiww>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 20:15:16 -0000

Hi, Mirja,

Thanks for the reply.

It is good to reach the community to the best possible ways, and for my 
part I would like to more carefully pay attention to the IETF Announce 
email list to be reached.

However, there is a discrepancy in one point: we discuss online meetings 
in shmoo WG.  There is not one sign about 2-weeks online IETF meetings 
or of Plenary dissociated from the WGs.  That means that whatever we 
discuss in shmoo has no relevance to IETF - it looks like an exercise in 
discussion of online meetings whereas the actual decisions about IETF 
online meetings are made elsewhere.

That said, some of the reasons I wanted to attend the Plenary are:

- how many people attended IETF this time?  Can they know that before 
the WG week?

- will there be March in-person meeting?  Or not?

- in case of in-person part in March, are there plans around considering 
offering guarantees of non-spread?  Are there uniformizing directions 
towards common ways of characterizing the anti-covid proection, apps, etc?

But then again, maybe it makes no sense to discuss them, knowing that 
the decision making is somewhere else.

Alex

Le 09/11/2021 à 19:09, Mirja Kuehlewind a écrit :
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> sorry that you missed it. We are working on improved way to reach the 
> community. I think that is an important issue.
>
> At least there is the recording: 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Ml55Tl9lY
>
> Mirja
>
> *From: *112attendees <112attendees-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of 
> Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
> *Organisation: *CEA
> *Date: *Tuesday, 9. November 2021 at 18:43
> *To: *"112attendees@ietf.org" <112attendees@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[112attendees] Plenary last week - missed
>
> I missed the Plenary last week, because I didnt expect it there.
>
> This time IETF meeting is so strange.  It spans two weeks time with 
> importnat things in the first week, including the Plenary, but the WG 
> meetings are in the second week.
>
> All these discussions we had in shmoo WG about online or not online 
> and I did not see any sign about Plenary being in the first week.
>
> All these discussions about which 3-4 time slots are best around the 
> world, which UTC ways to refer to them, etc, and I missed the Plenary.
>
> Sigh...
>
> Alex
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email