Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 11 November 2021 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 112attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4CF3A0D91; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:18:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL=1.31, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHT-3TznEj6p; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472203A0D7E; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DFB18030; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:20:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15vofC6HQeoq; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:20:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C431802E; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:20:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1764421; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:18:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: 112attendees@ietf.org, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0dc96ba2-8581-f8ad-2538-c7a169bdf0ae@tenghardt.net>
References: <CAGgd1Oc1ExPD69QBtXcoxiCc-cvkcghuq3wk3+=-YQuLh1mRqw@mail.gmail.com> <7da133bc-b3d0-25a8-1add-088e1ce2565b@petit-huguenin.org> <YYhI6hZL6uS3FB5H@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-cnJa=LMh334N23k9oTDeG81Pv34LSZQWNwJpRtM2N5Rw@mail.gmail.com> <YYlRojIoGZm3wP0B@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A1406214-64D1-41AF-B555-96949263939F@gmail.com> <YYnzbCWL5ravYT9T@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3EB68C1B-34EF-4682-9B26-BB2828505A33@gmail.com> <72509A1BBBC128F5C590CA56@PSB> <m2tuglz9nb.wl-randy@psg.com> <YYqJhKko89CGmvf+@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKKJt-fvDPn+Ueffja_V0bs7AJdp6Nt6WObjaca4qJ==O4SV1A@mail.gmail.com> <0dc96ba2-8581-f8ad-2538-c7a169bdf0ae@tenghardt.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:18:17 -0500
Message-ID: <15728.1636593497@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/112attendees/qxYn9RcMSe1NhkN7OMEu27zcH7M>
Subject: Re: [112attendees] WG followup discussions in gather.town (was: Re: HotRFC Gather followup)
X-BeenThere: 112attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 112 attendees <112attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/112attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:112attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/112attendees>, <mailto:112attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:18:30 -0000

Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> wrote:
    > Hi Spencer,

    > On 11/10/21 7:36 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
    >> […]
    >>
    >> (at a minimum, AFAIK, don't you have to be the Zoom meeting host to assign
    >> people to breakout rooms?

    > According to my experience with Zoom breakout rooms:

    > Yes, if you are the Zoom meeting host, or if you have been assigned co-host,
    > you can create breakout rooms, and you can assign people to breakout rooms,
    > either randomly or by "dragging" specific people into specific
    > rooms. However, if you want everyone to choose their own breakout room, I
    > think you have to make everyone co-host of the Zoom meeting, which
    > gives them

No, at least not for the event I was at last week (that overlapped the plenary).
We were not co-hosts, but we could choose our side meetings.

It is, as many said, very top-down.

In the side room, however, random participants couldn't screen share.
That is, there were no back-of-the-envelopes available.

And the malware.
And the BS calendar integration.
And the last-minute, "oops, you need the native app"
And the video freezing every time for my karate class.
And the lack of ability to lock the screen to my Sensei, even when other
people were talking. (That's a bit fixed now)

Gather.town is not perfect, but I think it works very well for my use.
I'd like to understand more of why Fred hates it, though.