IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Mon, 28 March 2022 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22003A0C51 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 06:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIF60KWjHsou for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68DAF3A0C5B for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA1A62569; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:01:05 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09r5ZtC-dFkr; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:00:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.160.11] (unknown [192.168.160.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5322A6250B; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:00:55 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------Y8cG8ez4GEctDz51Zz9eoYw9"
Message-ID: <814b6583-0138-30b9-fe73-50d428d826a4@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:01:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "113attendees@ietf.org" <113attendees@ietf.org>
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se> <FRYP281MB103924A77F31F8B55CDDB659EE1B9@FRYP281MB1039.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <6CD03365-0106-4D71-97CB-EBEFADA82E69@cable.comcast.com> <CAPt1N1kiDF5Q57+VTS96qs8b-x9rJB64STFocQE-Qn=vs=bsVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1kiDF5Q57+VTS96qs8b-x9rJB64STFocQE-Qn=vs=bsVw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/pSIvL2PEXz5ZCHOpsJtuQwA0sIA>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:02:03 -0000

Yes we can discuss what we found challenging and people can discuss if 
there are ways to work on those challenges.

On 3/26/22 10:23, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Starting the list early sounds like a good plan.
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:20 Livingood, Jason 
> <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>     This was the IETF’s first COVID-era* hybrid meeting. I wish I
>     could have been there in person, but it didn't work out. I imagine
>     that - as usual - there will be some lessons learned that will be
>     applied next time at IETF-114. This hybrid meeting seemed to go
>     generally well, amidst great uncertainty and an extremely dynamic
>     global health environment. I really appreciate everyone's efforts
>     to carry off the meeting so successfully given all of that!!
>
>     The next meeting will be in Philadelphia in their (our)
>     summertime, which is typically a time when respiratory viruses are
>     at a low point. It is also usually quite warm & humid and people
>     can be comfortable outdoors**. So I am hopeful we may see more
>     in-person attendance, by who knows***.
>
>     Jason
>
>
>     * I’m trying to train myself to say COVID-era rather than
>     post-COVID. ;-)
>     ** There are several small outdoor parks within 1 - 4 blocks walk
>     of the venue. The city has the Fairmont Park system, which is
>     4,100 acres in size
>     *** I wonder if it is worth opening the 114attendees list early so
>     people can discuss things related to attendance before the start
>     of registration (which is usually the trigger for creating the
>     list)? It might cut down on the noise on other lists.
>
>     -- 
>     113attendees mailing list
>     113attendees@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees
>
>

-- 
Standard Robert Moskowitz
Owner
HTT Consulting
C:248-219-2059
F:248-968-2824
E:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com

There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who 
gets the credit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email