Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 16 August 2022 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA1AC1524C7 for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.675
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.675 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.571, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vaB0GPX5cbN3 for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58226C1524B5 for <114attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27GEcUXr009293; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:44:45 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Xs8oYXvKq71QzOSna9IhMD7iG/kF7vVSZLN2AYMPSxs=; b=KVDJ1ORhWTls0ojyuQmGWWut3BlFxntdPBz7GQ+AShKF7Q2egLmAKQWpu0AjQrfDdQXV zya9tfbB3HRiJSgGrID0UsQVviWX4RQoe1u6AjP4KiTuiiLZQXwLD8U+csqk2YmG//ol dQdqbs1r9omL9ArHHmnPHLMZ1ue2RqRMrTKHFLR7ff3YG5eb7C0RIs8Y7MpGFbl2PUD1 JKDWMTDSIj+13YF/vyzECpodxG5casiDc6aWg/oDkXnmu/3viU1NEEh2AAmYfU+q582B br5M+XHEDr6uh54xAblc18QsPjDStp8Cl9svt2kLb0uxHcSoS67eGPxmhAa9W0q0AQfV 7g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j03egth51-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:44:45 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27GCUfVw027851; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:44:44 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.202]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hx79wg4r5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:44:44 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.9; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:44:44 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.009; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:44:43 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: "114attendees@ietf.org" <114attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London
Thread-Index: AQHYroo+H4mho08/jUWk6rmbu3pgs62sLhaAgAAG6wCAAAEBAIAABkGAgAALuQCABI3ZAIAAMPgAgAABiQCAARHHgIAACbEA//+/nYA=
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:44:43 +0000
Message-ID: <F3FF62DC-7038-489E-9842-3A696F67EF5E@akamai.com>
References: <4B348C11-79CE-4E7E-9DFD-B5CE79224767@ietf.org> <2F1594AF-4729-4908-918E-CD2151639E23@samuelsmith.org> <9c06d39e-0a03-916f-89e3-eff9ed2231bf@petit-huguenin.org> <CF6F11B2-6E3D-45FD-B520-29FE7DA52658@live555.com> <df828417-9229-4f67-93bf-9de9202e1950@petit-huguenin.org> <LO0P123MB660168369A86618248E627B5A9679@LO0P123MB6601.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMOjQcFkuBWOGPCwP=UFbodA15R79COvncHw-nm1YmFFoL1N+w@mail.gmail.com> <6aa68882-60bb-4a7c-ad84-51c58f7bd78a@evequefou.be> <B53FD62C-6AFD-4048-823E-F723A14C207B@gmail.com> <9e5b5853-2f5b-e5ab-19da-562f8a099b7b@joelhalpern.com> <CAPt1N1kiuq6PnQUkKbqekdhoJ-s8EXiUAOyYKt3ekZ94vNokyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAce=5fqe-cEtqT1Zp23HwdB1-fhA585YEpBTDowQBrDyEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=MkgpF7d65_NGGZkwB9AVHcC7jKBDeEymGRcna=RY2hw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=MkgpF7d65_NGGZkwB9AVHcC7jKBDeEymGRcna=RY2hw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.63.22070801
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F3FF62DC7038489E98423A696F67EF5Eakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-16_08,2022-08-16_02,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208160059
X-Proofpoint-GUID: uZ0sZ4zCit5p-vgPSQMXM5MZxNb0xeLS
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: uZ0sZ4zCit5p-vgPSQMXM5MZxNb0xeLS
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-16_08,2022-08-16_02,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208160060
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/114attendees/7ckMRwAj0LWgDkwGhOrHJq-wDgE>
Subject: Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London
X-BeenThere: 114attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 114 attendees <114attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/114attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:114attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:44:52 -0000

> I was pointing out that if we are /not/ doing online-only, then necessarily we have accepted as true the conjecture that meeting in person adds significant value. And that being the case, the metric for what policy to have for in-person meetings should not be "how many people will be infected with this policy" but rather "how many people will come with this policy."

I fully agree.

(It’d be nice if people trimmed duplicate signatures :)