IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London

John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> Sat, 13 August 2022 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924C8C1527B7 for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 09:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=RH+YDgFJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=lNDtV9qr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fAD8dnUV-mZK for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 09:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DA6C14CF05 for <114attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 09:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16904 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2022 16:17:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=4205.62f7cea1.k2208; bh=0/GWiQnPXW4jPLWNDifAMSQo/RShPDkHUgbCRq0KCuE=; b=RH+YDgFJ4rzeV2U1CTPhdFoXUv6Gmf37ZjtUkv8h1vDvI8FWyJZ8oy5STHH7dVpvQEVHtc3X2kMgywofFHJDFp77f4TCaeugxfML/AQoIGWPuUPkB9GatsVQNrianIgNs2hrE2109QVCh4QXDkohfyZ63LwO+pCJbEgfN6WG/ZI8nnJfCTRB4BQ1JRFdCn2PagypV3X3cL5BPonf4XofD0PzkctSZQAvVKUMY2Srvd+Y6G/JTeY6mDmzFkd8LdksQAx7XryX8FJvRxhwLXiAW1XLHEpVuuYQ9lIKqzs4lT3MtqZMxml2Wfaw/9IgPXeTnI8o+WT05cUymBlCdL1/9w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=4205.62f7cea1.k2208; bh=0/GWiQnPXW4jPLWNDifAMSQo/RShPDkHUgbCRq0KCuE=; b=lNDtV9qrwfiXXYL5y3HQlB9iZQbdcZRdFbeZ9h1RLoP6DBMSSCTIIUKUg2ep9jIfDnXUj658ZwVj6CtLsGQKoEJpBqE5IUhBeXkbgbTskfE81B2ewu31QeeeYcEDQ5bIQ7vyc7NA2pD0nYwFs6TCDQg1nBtPb6Auwh2MJp+LyJIZ3TLXiYJ9L1DivABDsz3A0pNyGMBP1gAejAr8J3yK9mpblD3GWbiZb364JM53JBB7c22pbZ4GYFloy04HQ/AFRTSw2ZD5rZ87Wb3okd7QQtJhRS2a6Q+JMyyRS8b47bGLXklf0pWlkCQXZBfaXbClI+bH1lONPcBC1oJeVG7N4w==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 13 Aug 2022 16:17:37 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D9AF0478831E; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 12:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 12:17:36 -0400
Message-Id: <20220813161736.D9AF0478831E@ary.local>
From: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: 114attendees@ietf.org
Cc: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
In-Reply-To: <EE6C5371-E205-44B1-B74B-B839D373C721@theipv6company.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/114attendees/IAM1IFqEGMgY-hLhHn5_4QNIcfw>
Subject: Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London
X-BeenThere: 114attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 114 attendees <114attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/114attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:114attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:17:44 -0000

It appears that Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com> said:
>Exactly. Anything beyond that may be a criminal act against law, and should be persecuted.

Perhaps we should add criminal law to the areas outside our expertise where we should avoid straying.

R's,
John

PS: I also agree with Jay's suggestions, with a tweak to say that anything that is documented
to provide equivalent or better protection to that from an N95 is OK.

>El 12/8/22, 22:34, "114attendees en nombre de Ross Finlayson" <114attendees-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de finlayson@live555.com> escribió:
>
>    I think that the IETF (and IETFers) should avoid straying into areas outside their areas of expertise, and just follow whatever policy is recommended
>by the locality where each meeting is held.
>
>    	Ross.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email