IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 12 August 2022 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E774EC14CF16 for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXD4YPWEDE8H for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BADC14F6E5 for <114attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1oMdMM-0006k8-Nn; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 22:42:30 +0000
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:42:30 -0700
Message-ID: <m2r11lqe21.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: 114attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <7BC7EF7C-A15B-469E-80D8-3D712BF0BF3F@tony.li>
References: <4B348C11-79CE-4E7E-9DFD-B5CE79224767@ietf.org> <2F1594AF-4729-4908-918E-CD2151639E23@samuelsmith.org> <9c06d39e-0a03-916f-89e3-eff9ed2231bf@petit-huguenin.org> <CF6F11B2-6E3D-45FD-B520-29FE7DA52658@live555.com> <1497317499.409044.1660340471601@connect.xfinity.com> <7BC7EF7C-A15B-469E-80D8-3D712BF0BF3F@tony.li>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/114attendees/KEprCyJZZDJsa5n525Gn0H9mATs>
Subject: Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London
X-BeenThere: 114attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 114 attendees <114attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/114attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:114attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 22:42:38 -0000

> Or maybe… the IETF should learn from its mistakes, realize that
> putting people’s health at risk is simply not worth it, and revert to
> a purely virtual meeting.

i have sympathy for this, and certainly will not attend in person.  but,
as long as remote participation is not disadvantaged, if a bunch of folk
want to risk running off the earth's edge, i have better things to do
than trying to stop them.

as long as remote participation is not disadvantaged:

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email