IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London

John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> Mon, 15 August 2022 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB840C152700 for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=G/wctbUq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=GW+gMt9f
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzrtOn6FeEaM for <114attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D731CC1526F9 for <114attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 76022 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2022 23:51:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=128f4.62fadbe9.k2208; bh=8Ihsl+x6FhPFMj54yWX8H/Pv/HHen8K8Ub7Dk2lXbpU=; b=G/wctbUqczkKHmp0UoYvHVLb3+1rFJ/6YCLskIzqnd7BQxfIKh4QQHJi43i4SU0mqjzT9SpVaBvcVsvVYatN5D/6Az36Uq79lidfY+5rzepYlmMJsNzNgco3wv3GxLamrgrWvBaMa+FLDDV18/X5+LgQfBpsXIjQxXhyBExNm2TdRvuz+U1isUfPsaPHKCAROLhlk6j6J2VHcNR6KbiszoYY4gMd1mM6W+RnCLCYi2ahedrVD2tpppPCiTJ+hcNpoY/M1y8UvpeL+869OUXXrBPXE2N8Rjcgs3lgTjpNNrLYg0C6Jt62dzWHdDuNlNiE5skdUR9H8Jb8If70oalI7w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=128f4.62fadbe9.k2208; bh=8Ihsl+x6FhPFMj54yWX8H/Pv/HHen8K8Ub7Dk2lXbpU=; b=GW+gMt9fQxIKqDJmVzAOqh3+elEx4Eda+2WBPdsPhZVZvKr0QgrWPoE9y+UqUjNN3anMpD1NI9vP4aqCLUTX5BuxMo2vQmWOzmy7Ta2PECb8Q4/S5iZ1LJ4SnSDU2I3ZRZgVyEIqvCAcq4ovxJ5nS5IU7rTMiyA7zeEl8LQFdleOJu603G9/xLJprqyov3nsZb5ndSgkatTzdhoSW/s89K2bTsy1irte5pbXnB2ar9q/PHn3ViFRv7mgcb1mKfXaD+Juqc+qK3WboxWz4Ningm+Rby/HeZhfQ9EuhS/td6x0dghRpAQm1bcDHkk6E7Xng1HRnGqJsxEBhS4hm32ujA==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 15 Aug 2022 23:51:05 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id EF59647A1651; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:51:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:51:04 -0400
Message-Id: <20220815235104.EF59647A1651@ary.local>
From: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: 114attendees@ietf.org
Cc: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
In-Reply-To: <877D5EE5-D530-44FC-AB27-7EE1AFCA2BB2@theipv6company.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/114attendees/f9PJlq9lMCWQweeJY4vp0MYEQNk>
Subject: Re: [114attendees] [114all] Consultation on COVID management for IETF 115 London
X-BeenThere: 114attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 114 attendees <114attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/114attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:114attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/114attendees>, <mailto:114attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 23:51:11 -0000

It appears that Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com> said:
>
>I don't think those stats are valid, because they ignore:
>If the infection was produced during the trip to/from the IETF.
>If the infection was produced right before traveling to IETF.
>If the infection was produced outside the meeting rooms where the mask mandatory policy applies (breaks, bars, open areas, hotel corridors, during meals, …).

Since there is no way we can tell, I would think that any sensible
person would note that the cost of wearing a mask is trivial, and the
potential benefit signficant both to the wearer and people around her
or him. So let's continue wearing the fripping masks.

R's,
John

PS: If anyone is planning to tell us about CO2 poisoning due to masks, or your
personal story about how masks are about freedom, just don't.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email