IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [115attendees] Public Side Meeting Tuesday 15: 30 - Is Privacy preserving Web Filtering Possible?

John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> Sat, 12 November 2022 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0F8C14CF15 for <115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 05:42:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=fgZVjRDL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=9gLPQgXZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDKUdTrL_IRx for <115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 05:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBD19C14F75F for <115attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 05:42:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 49502 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2022 13:42:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=c158.636fa2c1.k2211; bh=pD3shdlJvX1lqshOUqPiyJewLnZFlCX0y+QcH5cPSR0=; b=fgZVjRDLTDwF1zpq2Z9immirooQkvWFB+8jp90W0hqaFyDVJTda3MNuLJbYR+ULvVB7rNvEil5Ch2V0KWFkQ0CR7yizamqL2ABJJ9Ug0zn63h9Owobv7zYdKrOv+MGbQHxsf0MEiwBAayGqEHMeZ7IbwY2npFEmoQ3ZhTCCf+Io6bZ/Rz44PgKUK9WEeAVFOKwzEcdBvDjAEfuL2y3MmL3iYj5NeIse2x3575hRrIbs0cyvHGDmBrx83AvhaOBmoqdSpVejRL3sYXViPnhx0uLGUZ1NLf8xqIuJA6cTc7UhqZNp97ui0zOC/c3kc/7+iS3wPdmQplSW3YmY5ZHN3ww==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=c158.636fa2c1.k2211; bh=pD3shdlJvX1lqshOUqPiyJewLnZFlCX0y+QcH5cPSR0=; b=9gLPQgXZ/+VI9I13jEdc4ve3iCsG7AOPksZZY/CMNHGujF/OCDKnIbe9XMSzbns0q8n5eg5wq19vFGnuzhwfajAxWr65FEwwDilUS4MwSg4wtUGJz9NqqXHXGGwGNNEGli/LFQKGQE3D4pAWPc1UxziYKLd4d6LazVOl1g+RIcUv/fbTT1XfKCUlqdOf6e0l/2s7dzKG88evjmFqHsM2R6IIZ0+imv+AFkS0unZLtU/iBw0DKWQIFhYA7Xo66y9wuIUD8nXJeXd0f2JKOWWkDkfCrOvqtdCEpOqzUOYW0Uhq2byHSafDCQnYpCPXpA3hZNF4JuwB6wcsf0xOmNVeVQ==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 12 Nov 2022 13:42:25 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8F05F4EE14E9; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 13:42:23 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 13:42:23 +0000
Message-Id: <20221112134224.8F05F4EE14E9@ary.local>
From: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: 115attendees@ietf.org
Cc: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
In-Reply-To: <655425.1668235037@dyas>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/115attendees/3BAdygn3p4Te8YF0mVgkqnaVi4w>
Subject: Re: [115attendees] Public Side Meeting Tuesday 15: 30 - Is Privacy preserving Web Filtering Possible?
X-BeenThere: 115attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: 115attendees <115attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/115attendees>, <mailto:115attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/115attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:115attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:115attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/115attendees>, <mailto:115attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 13:42:33 -0000

It appears that Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> said:
>Yes, and the lawyers who put them there are largely incompetent, because the
>notices only apply to other lawyers, and there is significant legal view
>point that indiscriminately putting them all emails renders them completely
>meaningless, and presents a legal risk.

In the US, they barely apply to other lawyers, since they are due to a
cargo-cult misunderstanding of a rule related to misdirected faxes.

>I think we should respect his boilerplate, and we should discard all emails
>that have them.

I'm with you.

R's,
John

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status