IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [115attendees] Public Side Meeting Tuesday 15:30 - Is Privacy preserving Web Filtering Possible?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 11 November 2022 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1324CC14F749 for <115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:42:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9oSD8JDJyLc for <115attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3D1C14F73B for <115attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id a27so2510645qtw.10 for <115attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:42:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Jy5yfMrj+bPlfmBSN9YY17RyMmrTANFrhVsy7Ln6B6U=; b=CS7l5yOESPMkWF7atTiJu1kh5/804o99raER8iYmeG5ups6269kDOwgjf8HMzhaHnv 1RvgVsR0YzutjPI3X48Fck5QttevgMhLS5aLGu7erREm0+bUuWgSyFXNpkicglzhaBeG kr1pz3QNvEMmrGm5FCkhf4ZnBhQVTup06W3MGNUKpdkRLOFQ9EGoZz1iOv4wHyITdHEA mJxuuDN8QYty1Nrr9sU+B4Y9/DrSMMktoEBsXoxAxD0Rj07AvIMBZutRcvwy+ncMosZt vPDMn/5K4ulYBrPhXmdMvqojp8+9nuDu3wMDHuxxfrtDfFN4FSTuBtmtpmfDeXa9A0vk 9bwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Jy5yfMrj+bPlfmBSN9YY17RyMmrTANFrhVsy7Ln6B6U=; b=E5rwon6S+R2iCdpLUhMx2tUQyFl9WBKy6HhaHG9B4Fn3ce+zLUacoIY3qY1F4KMt10 fWP1Us1AU/ytLwf6wScgZDFdobpY0Wo74NB/qTqQ7nA3WhEudyEdv2+GG7jsVkiLZEQy ib/H0XKW79+CrPdBZWcDFjOLDln29XTHVmbfZ6wU/wuQjSb0Cq4NtVDXSPL6HwWa44kd icxiaolgI5qG1GlS4cOlg7v1XC/s87X7RN9gH57R3+10HlN/Khtx4osCwZOQoY1E5e5K t1xzyH7u5kTMyR0SbTEjuQaOIKrSfBDqCH15+uMaeb5dFs2ucdzrbs8sdGHLOPJ0BXJR Zrhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnxyeW6YKHJ0ev6h2F685Wlp1NS+OI8STd3LbJdRSZKxjxh5R7z kIAb1advEnwsc4Boff6dL50OIhys3k13lA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4ZcXjnv7YrGQ9KWf4UXa8JnG7TIjk71eE+m+qBz+A/qXV9IVnQA41Fz27r1d1KitCVac3+tQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5a13:b0:399:ba6b:d782 with SMTP id fy19-20020a05622a5a1300b00399ba6bd782mr843022qtb.27.1668166921936; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:67c:1232:144:dcd:1de2:65fa:8e0c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d27-20020ac84e3b000000b00398313f286dsm1142634qtw.40.2022.11.11.03.41.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AA0F7AA2-AFAD-464E-BC21-A825141761CE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <8C55D332-8221-4753-B050-9E5E8FE81069@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:41:55 +0000
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Amelia Ikeda <ietf@amelia.dev>, "115attendees@ietf.org" <115attendees@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <999BCB20-7D2B-4CC2-92F8-B457DCA863C0@gmail.com>
References: <DB9PR05MB9269E05720CB0B29EF5FFEA08D3C9@DB9PR05MB9269.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <F15AF308-CB40-4CC5-A3DB-6D4A3C88BD1E@gmail.com> <b8826bef-7eb3-4382-bdad-2ceba99b4ff8@app.fastmail.com> <DS0PR19MB6504F4DE2AABA8BAD92273CC8C009@DS0PR19MB6504.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <1ABDBEB1-41A1-4E86-BD1D-A8DF78126F70@gmail.com> <76e3075c-7ce3-490a-b00d-b663d68ef2a0@app.fastmail.com> <1308284956.30760.1668164112469@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <8C55D332-8221-4753-B050-9E5E8FE81069@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/115attendees/eC6POuPP0WOs-zDN_BXzewgxZPo>
Subject: Re: [115attendees] Public Side Meeting Tuesday 15:30 - Is Privacy preserving Web Filtering Possible?
X-BeenThere: 115attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: 115attendees <115attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/115attendees>, <mailto:115attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/115attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:115attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:115attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/115attendees>, <mailto:115attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:42:13 -0000

Yoav,

> On Nov 11, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 11 Nov 2022, at 12:55, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Il 11/11/2022 10:13 GMT Amelia Ikeda <ietf@amelia.dev> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> He did, yes, but chastising the tremendous amount of people who use corporate accounts for these type of things — as such meetings and discussions are often related to their work — isn’t the answer.
>> Agreed. I do not understand why so many people here feel the need to jump on newcomers and immediately challenge them in public, on list, in quite aggressive terms, for things like email formatting or their choice of words or other non-topic-related issues. It is a behaviour that I do not see in other organisations, that would be considered rude in most parts of the world, and that makes this environment unwelcoming.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> These footers contain legal threats such as “may be unlawful” or “may be prosecuted”. They have no place in public forums. You can’t just ignore these or regard them as meaningless corporate things. We live in litigious times.

+1

Though, in my limited understanding of contacts, it’s not a binding contract to just send text like this.  For that to happen, the other party would have to have agreed to it.

Bob

> 
> Dan got some very gentle ribbing from Stephane and from Fred.  That is to be expected, and is in no way “aggressive”.
> 
> Yoav
> 
> --
> 115attendees mailing list
> 115attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/115attendees

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status