Re: [118attendees] Upstream Usage - Place UR Bets ;-)

You should listen to Jen’s presentation in v6ops this IETF. Short answer:
no, that’s not what nat64 is.

Op vr 17 nov 2023 om 04:35 schreef Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>

> Ted Lemon writes:
> > I wonder if it would be a useful exercise to try to do a v6-mostly
> network by default next time. (That is,
> > mimic the best practices Jen Linkova has been telling about).
>
> Isn't that was "nat64" is?
>
> (I used that from time to time at #118, but mostly "eduroam" because
> that's what I use everywhere... I know I know, those pampered brats from
> academia ;-)
> --
> Simon.
>
> > Op do 16 nov 2023 om 16:26 schreef Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
>
> >  On Thu, Nov 16 2023 at 9:52 AM, Marco Davids <marco.davids=
> 40sidn.nl@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> >  Interesting!
>
> >  I'd like to see more of these statistics. Like what was the percentage
> of IPv6 traffic?
>
> >  I will try and remember to collect that information next time.
>
> >  Also it would be interesting to know what the usage of the ietf-V6ONLY
> and ietf-nat64 SSID's
> >  was.
>
> >  The ietf-v6only utilization was, for all intents and purposes, zero. I
> don't think that we have pretty
> >  charts and graphs of "ietf" vs "nat64", but I'll try and remember to
> save those next time too...
>
> >  W
>
> >  Thanks!
>
> >  Op 14-11-23 om 16:43 schreef Livingood, Jason:
>
> >  Thanks to data from Sean Croghan, I can pass along that peak number of
> devices connected
> >  to the WiFi network was 870. Peak bandwidth usage:
>
> >  * Downstream peak ~750 Mbps
> >  * Upstream ~250 Mbps
>
> >  --
> >  Marco
>
> >  --
> >  118attendees mailing list
> >  118attendees@ietf.org
> >  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/118attendees
>
> >  --
> >  118attendees mailing list
> >  118attendees@ietf.org
> >  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/118attendees
>
> > --
> > 118attendees mailing list
> > 118attendees@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/118attendees
>
>