[16NG] RE: review of draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-00

"John.zhao" <john.zhao@huawei.com> Wed, 31 January 2007 00:56 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC3mB-0001sE-1x; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:56:39 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC3m9-0001s8-FE for 16ng@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:56:37 -0500
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.54]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC3m6-0004Ps-G1 for 16ng@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:56:37 -0500
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JCP00CFAJX4EM@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:55:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JCP004QOJX1F2@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:55:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z49950 ([10.121.32.101]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0JCP00320JWYGH@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for 16ng@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:55:49 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:55:42 +0800
From: "John.zhao" <john.zhao@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4BB931F00625F54DA8B8563E5A5CA25A01347208@MCHP7I6A.ww002.siemens.net>
To: "'Riegel, Maximilian'" <maximilian.riegel@siemens.com>
Message-id: <002d01c744d2$8b87eb30$6520790a@china.huawei.com>
Organization: Huawei Technologies Co., LTD.
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-index: AcdEQ2xWVR4qvH0PQ2WzdkPSro1SKQAW1m7QAAyuBBA=
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c307e466c5fb8dd2974e846d3b474c9f
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
Subject: [16NG] RE: review of draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-00
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: john.zhao@huawei.com
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1175985619=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

Hello Max

 

         Thanks. From your explain, you mentioned two method can be used to
know about the IP addresses: 

1) Intercepting the DHCP message exchange;   

2)Just looking at the source IP addresses of upstream packets.

         To the method 1) , it will need DHCP stack to do that. 

As to the method 2) ,if that means we have to monitor the source IP address
of every packets. Otherwise , we can make sure when the MS/SS change it’s
address. 

Right?

         

Best Rgds,

Thanks,

 

  _____  

发件人: Riegel, Maximilian [mailto:maximilian.riegel@siemens.com] 
发送时间: 2007年1月31日 2:56
收件人: john.zhao@huawei.com
抄送: 16ng@ietf.org
主题: RE: review of draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-00

 

Hi John.zhao,

 

ProxyARP must know about the IP addresses being used by the SS/MSs. The
information can be retrieved by intercepting the DHCP message exchange or
just looking at the source IP addresses of upstream packets.

 

With this information Proxy ARP can respond to ARP messages instead of
broadcasting the message to all the SS/MSs.

 

Bye

Max

 

  _____  

From: John.zhao [mailto:john.zhao@huawei.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:51 AM
To: Riegel, Maximilian
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
Subject: review of draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-00

Hi Max,

 

         In section 7.3, there is a sentence that ‘The unicast IPv4
addresses can be learned by examining the source address of packets or DHCP
Response message.’ But why this operation is needed? And if we will need
the layer-3 operation in this place?

         Best Rgds,

Thanks,

 

 

 

 

 

         John.zhao

_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng