RE: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP
"Samita Chakrabarti" <Samita.Chakrabarti@AzaireNet.com> Mon, 18 June 2007 18:36 UTC
Return-path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1I0M5e-0003Qj-L7; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:36:38 -0400
Received: from 16ng by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1I0M5d-0003OZ-Ua
for 16ng-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:36:37 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0M5d-0003OR-L2
for 16ng@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:36:37 -0400
Received: from mail2.azairenet.com ([207.47.15.6])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0M5c-000297-2D
for 16ng@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:36:37 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:36:34 -0700
Message-ID: <D4AE20519DDD544A98B3AE9235C8A4C2B487E1@moe.corp.azairenet.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP
thread-index: AcexxHNblRjBLAy5RcOIhlOT1hSh3AAEZNAQ
From: "Samita Chakrabarti" <Samita.Chakrabarti@AzaireNet.com>
To: "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya@ieee.org>,
<behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 17e5edc4dfd335965c1d21372171c01c
Cc: 16ng@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>,
<mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1988170615=="
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Behcet, Please see below. 6. Subnet Model and IPv4 Address Assignment The Subnet Model recommended for IPv4 over IEEE 802.16 using IP CS is based on point-to-point link between MS and AR, hence each MS will be on different IP subnet. Proposed Changes: The Subnet Model recommended for IPv4 over IEEE 802.16 using IP CS is based on point-to-point link between MS and AR. [SC>] Fine by me. [behcet] What is the difference between the two? Why change the original text? [SC>] As far as I understand the proposed change is requesting an editorial change. If the current text in the draft is already clear enough and folks in wg feel that there is no change necessary, we will do accordingly. Thanks for bringing it up. -Samita
_______________________________________________ 16NG mailing list 16NG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng
- [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP Daniel Park
- RE: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP Samita Chakrabarti
- [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP Behcet Sarikaya
- RE: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP Samita Chakrabarti
- RE: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP 김상언
- RE: [16NG] Comments on IPv4CS subnet model and ARP Samita Chakrabarti